On February 5, 2013, Bill S-14, the Fighting Foreign Corruption Act, an act to amend the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (the “Act”), was introduced by the federal government and received its first reading in the Senate. The proposed amendments reinforce the federal government’s commitment to combat corruption and bribery of foreign public officials. To date, there have only been three convictions under the Act, but there are currently thirty-five ongoing investigations.
Anti-corruption legislation should be of concern to all Canadian businesses and individuals conducting business abroad. Entirely apart from the proposed changes to Canada’s bribery laws contained in Bill S-14, companies should review their internal compliance programs and codes of conduct regarding bribery and anti-corruption and should ensure that they are effective and up-to-date.
The Act, which came into force in 1999, is quite similar to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The United States has been at the forefront of the anti-bribery movement and many other jurisdictions have been following its lead. In 2011, the U.K. enacted its own anti-bribery law which in many respects went well beyond the U.S. law, most notably by prohibiting “facilitation payments” and by extending the extra-territorial reach of the law. The most interesting aspect of the proposed amendments to Canada’s
anti-bribery laws is that they go beyond the U.S. by prohibiting “facilitation payments,” but the proposed amendments do not go as far as the U.K. in extending the extra-territorial reach of the Canadian law. The interesting question is why Canada would want to impose restrictions in its law that are different from those imposed by U.S. law.
Bill S-14 contains five principal proposed amendments to the Act.
1. Facilitation payments are prohibited
The Act currently provides an exception for payments that are made to “expedite or secure the performance by a foreign public official of any act of a routine nature that is part of the foreign public official’s duties or functions” (“facilitation payments”). Some examples of facilitation payments include the issuance of a permit or licence, the processing of visas and work permits and the provision of services, such as police protection and loading and unloading cargo. Bill S-14 proposes to repeal this exception for facilitation payments. This amendment would bring the Act more in line with the U.K. Bribery Act, which prohibits facilitation payments, but would make it inconsistent with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which permits such payments in certain circumstances. One can question whether the elimination of the facilitation payments exception is desirable or realistic. In the U.K., for example, the sensitivity of facilitation payments was recognized and it was acknowledged that the eradication of facilitation payments is a long-term objective requiring international co-operation and
2. Establishes Nationality Jurisdiction
Bill S-14 would establish jurisdiction over all Canadian citizens, permanent residents and corporations incorporated in Canada, even if there is no real or substantial connection to Canada. The U.K. Bribery Act has a far broader extra-territorial reach in that it applies to organizations that carry on any part of their business in the U.K., regardless of their place of incorporation. This amendment will make it easier for Canada to exercise jurisdiction over Canadian persons and companies, regardless of where the alleged violation occurred.
3. Business no longer needs to be carried on “for profit”
Currently, the Act prohibits payments of bribes “in order to obtain or retain an advantage in the course of business”. Business is defined as “any business, profession, trade, calling, manufacture or undertaking of any kind carried on in Canada or elsewhere for profit.” Bill S-14 proposes to delete the words “for profit” from the definition. The effect of this amendment would be to broaden the application of the Act to include not-for profit organizations. When combined with the ban on facilitation payments, this would mean that a Canadian citizen working for a relief agency in Africa would be prohibited from making a small payment to a border guard in order to allow relief supplies to reach a refugee camp.
4. Increase Maximum Prison Sentence for Individuals
Bill S-14 would see the maximum prison sentence for a person who is convicted under the Act increased from 5 years to 14 years. (A contravention of the Act is also subject to unlimited fines.)
5. New Books and Records Offence
Bill S-14 also proposes to add a new offence for, among other things, establishing or maintaining accounts which do not appear in any of the books and records that the person is required to keep, or knowingly uses false documents, each for the purpose of bribing a foreign public official or for the purpose of hiding that bribery. This is one of the most significant changes to the law. This provision will bring the Act more into line with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The addition of this provision will also arguably make it easier to achieve convictions under the Act.
Although it may appear that the proposed amendments are intended to bring Canada’s anti-bribery law into conformity with other jurisdictions, which it does do in some respects, in other respects, it goes beyond what other jurisdictions have done. These inconsistencies make it very confusing for multinational organizations faced with a patchwork of legal restrictions. What is important to understand is that whatever may have been the attitude before, Canada is now giving anti-bribery enforcement real attention and is committing real resources to this initiative. If they have not already done so, Canadian companies operating in the international environment are going
to have to start paying closer attention to anti-bribery compliance.
Dispute ResolutionDecisions earlier this year from the English courts in ClientEarth v Shell Plc et al., and the recent appeal decision from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, shed light on climate change issues…
Intellectual PropertyAs of January 1, 2024, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) will be increasing most of its fees by 25%. Filing fees, renewal fees, opposition filing fees, as well as fees for initiating…
Dispute ResolutionIn Best Lawyers’ recent 2023 Business Edition, Peter Kolla explores justiciability, and other limitations Canadian Courts face when trying climate change cases. Excerpt from "The Climate…
Downstream GHG Emissions and Sierra Club Canada Foundation v Canada (Environment and Climate Change)The Federal Court’s recent decision in Sierra Club Canada Foundation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change) highlights the continuing focus in Canada on climate change litigation. The case…
Dispute ResolutionThe Superior Court of Justice has now released its decision in Mathur v. Ontario, a case we wrote about earlier this year and which is now a further example of an unsuccessful claim against a…
Force Majeure and COVID-19 – Appeal Decision in Niagara Falls Shopping Centre Inc. v. LAF Canada CompanyAlthough it has been three years since the COVID-19 pandemic hit Canada with full force in March 2020, the courts continue to address the fallout. In November 2022, we published a case update about a…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP is acting for Playmaker Capital Inc. in connection with entering into an agreement to be acquired by Better Collective A/S…
Construction and InfrastructureGoodmans LLP acted for HB Construction Co. in respect of the construction of a mine in New Brunswick. The litigation relates to a claim in respect of the installation of mechanical and electrical…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP acted for McCain Capital Partners in connection with its acquisition of Forest City Fire Protection. Forest City Fire Protection will now unite with Classic Fire Protection (another…
RestructuringGoodmans LLP acted for the Ad Hoc Committee of Lenders of Cirque du Soleil Entertainment Group in connection with the successful closing of a sale transaction and its emergence from creditor…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP represented Delivra Corp. in connection with its arrangement transaction with Harvest One Cannabis Inc., pursuant to which Harvest One acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP acted for Newmont Mining Corporation (NYSE: NEM) (Newmont or the Company) in connection with its agreement to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Goldcorp Inc. (NYSE: GG, TSX…
News & Events
Dispute ResolutionWe are delighted to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Litigation 2023 once again features Goodmans partners among Canada's experts in litigation.Congratulations to our 13 featured…
Dispute ResolutionIn an article published by Lexpert, David Conklin shares his insight in "High bar for class actions". “I hate to say this – it started with me 10 years ago – but defence counsel…
Banking and Financial ServicesWe are pleased to share Goodmans lawyers have been recognized across Who's Who Legal's National Guide: Canada 2023. WWL National Guides identify national or regional leaders in a sector, industry…