Canadian Regulations Released About Breach Notification and Record-Keeping Requirements
Yesterday, the Canadian government published the Breach of Security Safeguards Regulations (the “Regulations”), which specify how organizations are to comply with the breach notification and record-keeping amendments that were made to Canada’s federal privacy statute, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”). The Regulations are aligned with similar requirements under Alberta’s approach to breach notification and Europe’s soon-to-be-implemented General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), allowing for the continued free flow of personal information from the EU to Canadian organizations. Both the PIPEDA amendments and the Regulations will come into force on November 1, 2018, giving organizations, that have not yet done so, an opportunity to put in place systems to implement the new requirements.
See our April 5, 2018 Update, Canada’s Privacy Breach Notification Requirements Coming into Force, for our summary of the relevant provisions of PIPEDA.
Breach Notification
Each organization will be required to report to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada any breach of security safeguards involving personal information under its control, if it is reasonable in the circumstances to believe the breach creates a real risk of significant harm to an individual. If this test is met, and unless otherwise prohibited by law, an organization will be required to notify an individual of any breach of security safeguards involving the individual’s personal information under the organization’s control. Both the report to the Commissioner and notification to an individual must be made as soon as feasible after the organization determines that the breach has occurred.
The report to the Privacy Commissioner must be in writing and contain:
(a) a description of the circumstances of the breach and, if known, the cause;
(b) the day on which, or the period during which, the breach occurred or, if neither is known, the approximate period;
(c) a description of the personal information that is the subject of the breach to the extent the information is known;
(d) the number of individuals affected by the breach or, if unknown, the approximate number;
(e) a description of the steps the organization has taken to reduce the risk of harm to affected individuals that could result from the breach or to mitigate that harm;
(f) a description of the steps the organization has taken or intends to take to notify affected individuals of the breach; and
(g) the name and contact information of a person who can answer, on behalf of the organization, the Commissioner’s questions about the breach.
Notably, an organization may submit the best information available at the time of reporting to the Privacy Commissioner and may submit follow-up notifications, if it becomes aware of new information.
The notification to an affected individual must contain:
(a) a description of the circumstances of the breach;
(b) the day on which, or period during which, the breach occurred or, if neither is known, the approximate period;
(c) a description of the personal information that is the subject of the breach to the extent the information is known;
(d) a description of the steps the organization has taken to reduce the risk of harm that could result from the breach;
(e) a description of the steps affected individuals could take to reduce the risk of harm that could result from the breach or to mitigate that harm; and
(f) contact information the affected individual can use to obtain further information about the breach.
The new regulation permits two approaches to sending such notification to affected individuals – direct and indirect. Direct notification can be done in person, by telephone, mail, email or “any other form of communication that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances”. This last form of direct notification allows for flexible forms of notification specific to the circumstances of a particular breach situation. Indirect notification (given by public communication or similar measure that could reasonably be expected to reach the affected individuals) is to be given where:
(a) direct notification would be likely to cause further harm to the affected individual;
(b) direct notification would be likely to cause undue hardship for the organization; or
(c) the organization does not have contact information for the affected individual.
Record-Keeping
An organization will be required to keep and maintain – for a minimum of 24 months after the day on which the organization determines the breach has occurred – a record of every breach of security safeguards involving personal information under its control. The record-keeping obligation applies to all breaches, regardless of the risk of harm posed.
Such a record must contain information that enables the Privacy Commissioner to verify the organization’s compliance with the breach notification requirements. In other words, the organization must keep sufficient records to show it is tracking personal information security incidents and properly evaluating the risk of harm to individuals. An organization must provide the Privacy Commission with access to, or a copy of, such records upon request.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Technology
Four Legal Takeaways from the Proposed Canadian Social Media Legislation
On June 10, 2026, the federal government introduced Bill C-34, also known as the Safe Social Media Act. The proposed legislation represents a sweeping effort to regulate social media platforms… -
Privacy and Data Protection
Canadian Privacy Regulators Publish Findings and Guidance on OpenAI Privacy Compliance
Following a multi-year joint investigation, federal and provincial privacy regulators recently published their findings with respect to OpenAI’s collection and use of personal information to train… -
Privacy and Data Protection
B.C. Court Rules Facebook Liable for Privacy Violations in Class Action
Another chapter in the now decade-long saga of Douez v. Facebook was penned earlier this month as a British Columbia Court found Facebook liable for providing advertisers access to users… -
Technology
Technology Sourcing 2021 - Canada Chapter
Jessica Bishop and Peter Ruby co-authored the 1st edition of the International Comparative Legal Guide - Technology Sourcing 2021, Canada chapter. The Canada chapter covers common issues in technology… -
Banking and Finance
Federal Government Releases Draft Retail Payments Activities Act
On April 30, as part of the 2021 federal budget, Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance (the “Minister”) introduced Bill C-30, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Federal Privacy Regulation 2.0: Now with Bite and Bark
This week, the Canadian Federal Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry introduced for first reading in Parliament Bill C-11, An Act to enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act and the Personal…
Featured Work
-
Communications and Media
Sangoma Technologies to be acquired by BRC Group Holdings, Inc.
Goodmans LLP is acting for Sangoma Technologies Corporation in connection with a definitive arrangement agreement pursuant to which an affiliate of BRC Group Holdings will acquire all of the issued… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex Partners and co-investors acquire AirSprint
Goodmans LLP acted as M&A legal counsel to Onex Partners in connection with the acquisition of AirSprint Inc. by Onex and its co-investors… -
REITs
Carriage Hill Properties Acquisition Corp. acquires InterRent REIT
Goodmans LLP acted for a consortium that included CLV Group Inc. in connection with the acquisition of InterRent REIT, whereby pursuant to a plan of arrangement a newly formed entity named Carriage… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
HoudiniSwap acquired by Sol Strategies for US$18 million
Goodman LLP advised HoudiniSwap LLC in connection with its acquisition by Sol Strategies for US$18 million… -
Sports
GTCR-backed Ascent Sports Group acquires LiveBarn
Goodmans LLP acted as Canadian counsel to Ascent Sports Group, a company backed by GTCR LLC, in connection with its acquisition of LiveBarn, a Montreal-based provider of live and on-demand video and… -
Private Equity
Dayforce taken private by Thoma Bravo for US$12.3 billion
Goodmans LLP advised Dayforce, Inc. as Canadian counsel in connection with its acquisition by Thoma Bravo in an all-cash transaction with an enterprise value of US$12.3 billion…
News & Events
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Goodmans Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology 2026
We are thrilled to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology 2026 has named Goodmans lawyers among Canada's legal experts in the technology sector.Congratulations to our 15 featured… -
- 10:15 AM Privacy and Data Protection
Peter Ruby at ITechLaw’s 2026 World Technology Law Conference
Join Goodmans Partner Peter Ruby at ITechLaw’s 2026 World Technology Law Conference in Chicago on Thursday, May 14, 2026, from 9:00 – 10:15 AM CDT for the session, “1C: Safeguarding the Next… -
Banking and Finance
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2026 Recognizes Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans continues to be recognized in the 2026 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.Congratulations to the 90 Goodmans lawyers recognized as leaders across…