Canadian Regulations Released About Breach Notification and Record-Keeping Requirements
Yesterday, the Canadian government published the Breach of Security Safeguards Regulations (the “Regulations”), which specify how organizations are to comply with the breach notification and record-keeping amendments that were made to Canada’s federal privacy statute, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”). The Regulations are aligned with similar requirements under Alberta’s approach to breach notification and Europe’s soon-to-be-implemented General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), allowing for the continued free flow of personal information from the EU to Canadian organizations. Both the PIPEDA amendments and the Regulations will come into force on November 1, 2018, giving organizations, that have not yet done so, an opportunity to put in place systems to implement the new requirements.
See our April 5, 2018 Update, Canada’s Privacy Breach Notification Requirements Coming into Force, for our summary of the relevant provisions of PIPEDA.
Breach Notification
Each organization will be required to report to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada any breach of security safeguards involving personal information under its control, if it is reasonable in the circumstances to believe the breach creates a real risk of significant harm to an individual. If this test is met, and unless otherwise prohibited by law, an organization will be required to notify an individual of any breach of security safeguards involving the individual’s personal information under the organization’s control. Both the report to the Commissioner and notification to an individual must be made as soon as feasible after the organization determines that the breach has occurred.
The report to the Privacy Commissioner must be in writing and contain:
(a) a description of the circumstances of the breach and, if known, the cause;
(b) the day on which, or the period during which, the breach occurred or, if neither is known, the approximate period;
(c) a description of the personal information that is the subject of the breach to the extent the information is known;
(d) the number of individuals affected by the breach or, if unknown, the approximate number;
(e) a description of the steps the organization has taken to reduce the risk of harm to affected individuals that could result from the breach or to mitigate that harm;
(f) a description of the steps the organization has taken or intends to take to notify affected individuals of the breach; and
(g) the name and contact information of a person who can answer, on behalf of the organization, the Commissioner’s questions about the breach.
Notably, an organization may submit the best information available at the time of reporting to the Privacy Commissioner and may submit follow-up notifications, if it becomes aware of new information.
The notification to an affected individual must contain:
(a) a description of the circumstances of the breach;
(b) the day on which, or period during which, the breach occurred or, if neither is known, the approximate period;
(c) a description of the personal information that is the subject of the breach to the extent the information is known;
(d) a description of the steps the organization has taken to reduce the risk of harm that could result from the breach;
(e) a description of the steps affected individuals could take to reduce the risk of harm that could result from the breach or to mitigate that harm; and
(f) contact information the affected individual can use to obtain further information about the breach.
The new regulation permits two approaches to sending such notification to affected individuals – direct and indirect. Direct notification can be done in person, by telephone, mail, email or “any other form of communication that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances”. This last form of direct notification allows for flexible forms of notification specific to the circumstances of a particular breach situation. Indirect notification (given by public communication or similar measure that could reasonably be expected to reach the affected individuals) is to be given where:
(a) direct notification would be likely to cause further harm to the affected individual;
(b) direct notification would be likely to cause undue hardship for the organization; or
(c) the organization does not have contact information for the affected individual.
Record-Keeping
An organization will be required to keep and maintain – for a minimum of 24 months after the day on which the organization determines the breach has occurred – a record of every breach of security safeguards involving personal information under its control. The record-keeping obligation applies to all breaches, regardless of the risk of harm posed.
Such a record must contain information that enables the Privacy Commissioner to verify the organization’s compliance with the breach notification requirements. In other words, the organization must keep sufficient records to show it is tracking personal information security incidents and properly evaluating the risk of harm to individuals. An organization must provide the Privacy Commission with access to, or a copy of, such records upon request.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Entertainment
Canada launches public consultation on Generative AI and Copyright Law
On October 12, 2023, Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry and its Minister of Canadian Heritage launched a public consultation on the implications of generative artificial… -
Privacy and Data Protection
B.C. Court Rules Facebook Liable for Privacy Violations in Class Action
Another chapter in the now decade-long saga of Douez v. Facebook was penned earlier this month as a British Columbia Court found Facebook liable for providing advertisers access to users… -
Technology
Technology Sourcing 2021 - Canada Chapter
Jessica Bishop and Peter Ruby co-authored the 1st edition of the International Comparative Legal Guide - Technology Sourcing 2021, Canada chapter. The Canada chapter covers common issues in technology… -
Banking and Financial Services
Federal Government Releases Draft Retail Payments Activities Act
On April 30, as part of the 2021 federal budget, Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance (the “Minister”) introduced Bill C-30, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Federal Privacy Regulation 2.0: Now with Bite and Bark
This week, the Canadian Federal Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry introduced for first reading in Parliament Bill C-11, An Act to enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act and the Personal… -
Class Actions
Clarity Emerging in Data Breach Class Actions and the Risks Are High
A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court suggests that judges are increasingly willing to certify class actions brought in respect of data breaches. That willingness, when combined with the…
Featured Work
-
REITS and Income Securities
InterRent REIT to be acquired by consortium that includes CLV Group in partnership with GIC in $4 billion all-cash transaction
Goodmans LLP is acting for a consortium that includes CLV Group Inc. in partnership with GIC in connection with the acquisition of InterRent REIT, whereby pursuant to a plan of arrangement a newly… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Andlauer Healthcare Group to be acquired by UPS
Goodmans LLP is acting for Andlauer Healthcare Group (“AHG”) in connection with a definitive arrangement agreement with affiliates of UPS under which UPS has agreed to acquire AHG via an all-cash… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires CanPrev
Goodmans LLP acted for Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of CanPrev, a leading Canadian provider of vitamins, supplements, and other natural health products… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Ceridian Acquires Ideal
Goodmans LLP acted for Ideal, a leading talent intelligence software provider based in Toronto, Ontario in connection with its acquisition by Ceridian…
News & Events
-
Communications and Media
Goodmans Once Again Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology 2025
We are pleased to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology 2025 once again names Goodmans lawyers among Canada's top-ranked experts.Congratulations to our 15 featured lawyers:Amalia… -
Aging and Health Care
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2025 Once Again Recognizes Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP continues to be recognized in the 2025 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.Congratulations to the 96 Goodmans lawyers recognized as leaders across… -
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Recognized in the Inaugural Edition of Best Law Firms - Canada 2025
Goodmans is delighted to share we are featured in the inaugural edition of Best Law Firms - Canada 2025, recognizing us as one of the country’s exceptional law firms across 40 industries and practices…