An updated cartel immunity and leniency program (the “Program”) has been issued in Canada. Key takeaways for businesses and international practitioners are as follows:
- Under the Program, companies and individuals that self-report unlawful conduct (e.g., cartels) in Canada can benefit from (i) immunity from prosecution or (ii) leniency in the form of a significant reduction in the amount of the recommended fine.
- While the process of applying for immunity or leniency can be “paperless”, the Canadian Competition Bureau (the “Bureau”) may record witness interviews. Plaintiffs might seek disclosure of these recordings from the Bureau in follow-on litigation.
- A final grant of immunity may be delayed until long after an applicant has provided full cooperation.
- Applicants should carefully assess how the operation of the Program – including with respect to waivers and the timing of obligations – interacts with the operation of immunity and leniency programs in other jurisdictions.
Background
The Commissioner of Competition, who is the head of the Bureau, is responsible administering and enforcing of Canada’s Competition Act (the “Act”), including its criminal cartel provisions. After investigating a cartel, the Bureau may recommend to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) that a defendant be charged criminally. The DPP makes the final determination whether to file charges against a defendant. If charges are filed, the DPP must prove to a court the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Program provides companies and individuals that have engaged in criminal activity incentives to self-report to the Bureau; such self-reporting helps the Bureau detect and investigate cartels.
In the past few years, the DPP was unsuccessful in high profile cartel cases in court and declined to prosecute another high profile cartel. These outcomes were attributed to perceived shortcomings with the prior version of the Program; among other things, there was concern that applicants under the Program (the “Applicants”) were not compelled to continue their cooperation until trial. This updated version of the Program, issued by both the Bureau and the DPP, is designed to address these perceived shortcomings.
Immunity and Leniency Process
The process for applying for immunity or leniency is complex. Importantly, the application process can be paperless, but the Bureau may seek to audio or video record the interviews of an Applicant’s witnesses. Set out below is a chart detailing the main procedural steps for companies applying under the Program. Participation in the immunity and leniency processes requires careful strategic decision-making by Applicants at every stage (particularly for Applicants seeking immunity or leniency in other jurisdictions simultaneously).
Fine Calculation for Leniency Applicants
Under the Program, immunity Applicants are not subject to criminal conviction or any type of state sanction (although immunity Applicants may be subject to civil damages actions).
Leniency Applicants, by contrast, are expected to plead guilty and have a sentence entered by a court (leniency Applicants may also be subject to civil damages actions). Under the Program, the DPP and the Applicant will submit a recommended sentence to the court, which is calculated by determining the base fine, taking account of aggravating and mitigating factors, and then subtracting credits and discounts based on participation in the Program.
- Base Fine. The “base fine” is calculated as a percentage of the affected volume of commerce in Canada. The Bureau will use 10% as a proxy for the overcharge, but will also consider evidence that a lower overcharge is appropriate. Added to this amount is an additional 10% for deterrence and to ensure the fine is not a mere cost of doing business.
- Plus Aggravating Factors. The amount of the base fine is increased if there exist aggravating factors, which can include recidivism; coercion or instigation; a large corporate size or market share; vulnerable nature of the victims; or a high level of senior officer involvement.
- Minus Mitigating Factors. The base fine is decreased if there exist mitigating factors, which can include restitution of victims outside of civil damages suits; early termination of the unlawful conduct; a reduced ability to pay; or the existence of a compliance program that is credible, effective and consistent with the Bureau’s Bulletin on Corporate Compliance Programs.
- Minus Leniency Plus Credit. The base fine will be decreased by 5-10% if the Applicant provides evidence of further unlawful conduct (i.e., either a separate cartel, or unlawful conduct that is broader (e.g., longer) than previously known by the Bureau). The Applicant will receive immunity for that additional disclosure, and an additional reduction in the recommended fine for which the Applicant is receiving leniency.
- Minus Leniency Discount. The fine will be discounted by up to 50%. The level of discount the DPP will agree to depends upon the value of the Applicant’s cooperation to the Bureau’s investigation, which is determined by reference to a number of factors: the timing of the application; the timeliness of the Applicant’s disclosure; the availability, credibility and reliability of the Applicant’s witnesses; and the relevance and materiality of evidence produced by the Applicant.
Employees
The Program also provides relief for individuals associated with immunity or leniency Applicants. The nature of that relief varies depending upon (i) the Applicant’s status in the Program and (ii) the individual’s status with the Applicant. The table below describes the different forms of relief offered to individuals associated with Applicants.
To be eligible to benefit from the Program, (i) an individual must admit knowledge of or participation in the cartel and be prepared to cooperate in a timely fashion with the Bureau’s investigation, and (ii) Applicants must identify the individual to the Bureau. The Bureau will extend available relief to such individuals in all cases except where the individual will not admit her or his knowledge of or participation in the cartel, or fails to cooperate in the manner required.
Of Interest to International Practitioners
Aspects of the Program will be of particular interest to international practitioners. Notably:
- Recordings / Potentially Discoverable Material. The Bureau will seek to interview the Applicant’s witnesses (i.e., current and former employees). These interviews may be conducted under oath and video recorded; the purpose of recording is to impeach or cross-examine a witness if their court testimony is inconsistent with information previously provided. It is unclear whether or what legal privilege might protect such recordings, and there is a risk that plaintiffs might seek third party disclosure of such recordings from the Bureau in follow-on litigation.
- Applications in Other Jurisdictions. The Program requires that at the proffer stage, absent compelling reasons, an Applicant identify all of the other jurisdictions where the Applicant is applying for immunity or leniency.
- Waivers. The Program provides that the Bureau expects that Applicants, absent compelling reasons, will provide waivers of confidentiality “immediately” to permit the Bureau to communicate with agencies in other jurisdictions where the Applicant is applying for immunity or leniency.
- Timing Considerations. The Program provides for an application process with numerous prescribed time periods. The Program warns that the Bureau will not delay operation of these time periods solely because an Applicant has commitments arising out of immunity or leniency applications in other jurisdictions.
Conclusion
The updated Program provides valuable incentives for parties to unlawful conduct to self-report, but the Program’s operation is complex and requires careful strategic decision making by Applicants (particularly those whose conduct involves multiple jurisdictions).
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Competition and Foreign Investment
Canadian Guidance on Wage-Fixing and No-Poaching Agreements
The Competition Act has been amended to include a new criminal offence for employers that enter into agreements to fix wages, or that agree not to solicit or hire each other’s employees. The amendment… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
Government of Canada to Overhaul National Security Rules of the Investment Canada Act
The Government of Canada has introduced amendments to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) that propose to enhance the government’s ability to review, block or modify foreign investments in Canada on the… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
Competition Bureau to Study Competition in Grocery Sector; Proposes Launch of Merger Registry
The Competition Bureau is launching a market study of grocery store competition in Canada. This comes on the heels of mounting political pressure surrounding increased grocery prices. Market… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
The Public Competition Enforcement Review 14th Edition - Canada Chapter
Michael Koch, David Rosner, Devin Persaud and Josh Zelikovitz co-authored the Canada Chapter of The Public Competition Enforcement Review 14th Edition. The Public Competition Enforcement Review is an… -
Dispute Resolution
COVID Fall-Out: Ontario Judge Awards $1.2 Billion in Damages to Target Company in Failed Business Combination
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s recent decision in Cineplex v. Cineworld offers an interesting contrast to the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in AB Stable v. MAPS Hotel and Resorts… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
The Foreign Investment Regulatory Review, 9th Edition - Canada Chapter
David Rosner, Michael Koch and Joshua Zelikovitz co-authored the Canada Chapter of The Foreign Investment Regulatory Review, 9th edition. The ninth edition is an in-depth guide to the laws…
Featured Work
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Quebecor Inc. Acquires Freedom Mobile Inc. from Shaw Telecom G.P. for C$2.9 billion
Goodmans LLP acted for Rogers Communications Inc. in connection with the entering into of a purchase agreement for Quebecor Inc. (TSX:QBR.A) to acquire Freedom Mobile Inc. from Shaw Telecom G.P. for… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
IVC Evidensia Merger with VetStrategy
Goodmans LLP advised VetStrategy, the leading Canadian veterinary care provider in connection with its merger with IVC Evidensia, Europe’s leading veterinary care provider… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Brookfield Infrastructure's Sale of North American District Energy Business for $4.1 Billion
Goodmans LLP acted for Brookfield Infrastructure in connection with the sale of 100% of its North American district energy business, Enwave… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Berkshire Partners Acquire VetStrategy
Goodmans LLP represented Berkshire Partners LLC (“Berkshire”) in its July 31, 2020 acquisition of a majority stake in VetStrategy from Imperial Capital with a deal value of over US$1 billion. This… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. to acquire the Canadian Regional Jet program from Bombardier Inc.
Goodmans LLP is one of the Canadian counsel representing Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. (“Mitsubishi”) in connection with its agreement to acquire the Canadian Regional Jet (“CRJ”) Program from… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex Corporation Completes Acquisition of Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc.
Goodmans LLP represented Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. in connection with its CDN$445 million sale to Onex Corporation.The transaction brings together two of Canada’s pre-eminent investment firms…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans named one of Canada's Best Law Firms for 2023
We’re pleased to announce Goodmans was once again named to The Globe and Mail’s Canada’s Best Law Firms list, recognizing the firm as one of the country’s best law firms for 2023.Goodmans was… -
Banking and Financial Services
The Legal 500 Canada Continues to Recognize Goodmans with Top Tier Rankings
We are pleased to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top tier recognition from The Legal 500 Canada in their 2023 Guide released today. Recognition from The Legal 500 is based on… -
- 01:00 PM Competition and Foreign Investment
Devin Persaud at Epiq's webinar: Navigating Developments in Canadian Competition Law: Recent Highlights and the Look Ahead
Join Devin Persaud on November 4th for Epiq's webinar Navigating Developments in Canadian Competition Law: Recent Highlights and the Look Ahead.Topics will include:Reform of the…