“Are You an Artist?” L.A. Street Artist Answers Developers’ Question by Filing Copyright Infringement Lawsuit
In the Fall of 2019, Los Angeles street artist Tristan Eaton (“Eaton”) brought a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Federal Court of Canada against seven Ottawa, Ontario real estate developers, including 2592653 Ontario Inc., Constitution Building LP, Katasa Development Inc. and The Constitution Building GP Inc. (the “Developers”). Eaton alleges the Developers misappropriated his street art by reproducing it on social media and on a banner hung outside a residence, Theo Ottawa, marketed by the Developers to university students.
Eaton’s lawsuit appears to be the first proceeding in which a Canadian court will have the opportunity to determine whether street art is properly the subject of protection under the Copyright Act.
Background to Eaton v. 2592653 Ontario Inc. et al.
The work at the centre of the lawsuit is a colourful, stylized headshot of Audrey Hepburn that Eaton painted on the side of a New York City café for free as part of a public art initiative. He titled the mural Audrey of Mulberry and included his distinctive “tag” in the lower left-hand corner of the work to identify himself as the artist.
Eaton claims that real estate owners “typically pay significant fees and commissions” for the creation and/or use his large-scale outdoor murals, but in this case he was not contacted, paid, nor credited for the unauthorized reproduction of his mural on a promotional banner (the “Banner”) hanging on the side of a seven-story tall Ottawa building.
Adding insult to injury, Eaton claims that the Developers “distorted and mutilated” his work by, among other things, cropping it, resizing it, and overlaying the image with text that asked “Are you an artist?”. For Eaton, who has worked with clients such as Nike and Versace, created posters for former U.S. President Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, and counts his work in the permanent collections of the Museum of Modern Art and the Smithsonian, the answer is a resounding “Yes”.
Eaton’s Claim
Eaton seeks a declaration that the Developers’ actions infringed his copyright in the Audrey of Mulberry mural contrary to subsections 27(1) and (2) of the Copyright Act and infringed his moral rights provided under sections 14.1, 28.1 and 28.2 of the Copyright Act, since the Developers failed to credit him as the creator of the original work (his signature was removed, cropped out, or otherwise obscured in the reproductions of his art), fundamentally altered the aesthetic qualities of his piece, and associated him with their business enterprise without his permission. According to Eaton, these actions prejudiced his honour or reputation, causing the viewing public to literally question whether he is an artist.
Eaton seeks CAD$1,000,000 in damages for infringement, CAD$500,000 for exemplary and punitive damages, recovery of all infringing copies of his work in the Developers’ possession, and a permanent injunction restraining the Developers from reproducing his work on any of their properties or in social media posts.
Developers’ Defence
The Developers argue that they hired a graphic design agency, Cayenne Creative, to develop, design and produce the Banner on a “turnkey” basis. Based on their contract with Cayenne Creative, the Developers understood they could display the Banner and use it in their advertising materials without restriction. In addition, they claim that since Eaton had not registered his copyright in Canada when they commissioned the Banner, they could not have known that Eaton held copyright in the mural. Once they learned of Eaton’s claims, the Developers maintain that they immediately took steps to take down the Banner and remove the artwork from the Theo Ottawa advertising, and therefore should not be held liable for any infringement.
However, since ignorance is not a defence to copyright infringement, the Developers were wise to plead alternative defences. Most notably, they argued that
- any use of the mural should be exempt from infringement claims under ss. 32.2(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Copyright Act, which provide that it is not an infringement of copyright to reproduce in any drawing or photograph an architectural work or a work of artistic craftsmanship that is “permanently situated in a public place or building”; and
- their use of the mural in social media posts and other advertisements should be exempt from Eaton’s infringement claim under s. 30.7 of the Copyright Act, which protects those who incidentally and unintentionally include a protected work in another work or subject matter.
Interestingly, the Developers do not argue that the nature of Eaton’s mural (street art) could prevent him from asserting his copyright on the basis that the work is not sufficiently durable or “fixed” in some permanent way as required by the common law (since, in theory, outdoor works could be destroyed by natural elements or painted over by other street artists). Instead, the Developers’ defence presupposes that the fixation requirement has been met and Eaton holds copyright in the Audrey of Mulberry mural, but maintains that his infringement claim should be dismissed based on the defences described above.
Implications
Eaton v. 2592653 Ontario Inc. et al. gives the Federal Court an opportunity to definitively state whether a piece of street art is protected by copyright and consequently worthy of the same protections and defences afforded to other creators of artistic works under the Copyright Act.
It is, of course, possible the parties will reach a confidential settlement before the case is decided, in which case artists and legal experts will be left wanting an answer to the intriguing question (from a copyright law perspective) posed by the text of the Banner: “Are You an Artist?”. We eagerly await the Federal Court’s decision.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Entertainment
Ask an Expert: Key risks and considerations relevant to performers who are active on social media, Performers Magazine
In a recent article for ACTRA Toronto's Performers Magazine, Tara Parker and Megan Brooks discuss the considerations performers should weigh before posting something to a public-facing… -
Entertainment
Canada launches public consultation on Generative AI and Copyright Law
On October 12, 2023, Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry and its Minister of Canadian Heritage launched a public consultation on the implications of generative artificial… -
Entertainment
So You Want To Produce In Canada, Eh?
If you are considering producing in Canada, there’s a lot you not only need to know, but want to know. Why? Because it can save you both time and money - and who doesn’t want that? The discussion… -
Entertainment
CRTC Announces Three-Phased Public Consultation Plan to Implement the Online Streaming Act in Canada
On May 8, 2023, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) unveiled its three-phased regulatory plan (the “Regulatory Plan”) to consult with the public to implement the… -
Entertainment
The Online Streaming Act: Canada Passes New Legislation to Regulate Online Streaming Services
On April 27, 2023, Bill C-11, titled the Online Streaming Act (the “Act”), was passed by the Canadian Senate and received Royal Assent, officially becoming law in Canada. The Act is designed to… -
Technology
U.S. District Court Finds NBA Top Shot Moments may be Subject to U.S. Securities Laws
On May 12, 2021, a class action law suit was filed against Dapper Labs, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) alleging that Dapper Labs violated U.S…
Featured Work
-
Tax
Cineplex announces comprehensive refinancing plan
Goodmans is acting for Cineplex Inc., a leading Canadian entertainment and media company, in connection with its announcement of a comprehensive refinancing plan to improve financial flexibility and… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Cineplex Inc.'s Player One Amusement Solutions Business acquired by OpenGate Capital
Goodmans LLP acted for Cineplex Inc., a Canadian entertainment and media company, in connection with OpenGate Capital acquiring the amusement solutions business of Cineplex… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Screaming Eagle announces merger with Lionsgate Studios
Goodmans LLP is acting for Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. in connection with its proposed merger with the Studio Business of Lionsgate Entertainment Corp., comprised of its Television Studio and… -
Entertainment
Representing Shaftesbury Inc.
Goodmans LLP represents Shaftesbury Inc., a leading Canadian producer of scripted productions including the well-known and popular TV programs “Murdoch Mysteries," “Frankie Drake Mysteries," “Hudson… -
Entertainment
Launch of Blink49 Studios Inc.
Goodmans LLP acts for Blink49 Studios, a new Canadian-controlled studio venture backed by Endeavor Content… -
Entertainment
Amazon Prime Video Productions Filmed in Canada
Goodmans LLP provides ongoing advice to Amazon Studios re: productions produced or post-produced in Canada which stream on Amazon Prime Video…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2024 Continues to Recognize Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again been recognized in the 2024 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.91 Goodmans lawyers have been recognized as top-tier in their… -
Banking and Financial Services
Who's Who Legal Continues to Recognize Goodmans in the Canada 2023 Guide
We are pleased to share Goodmans lawyers have been recognized across Who's Who Legal's National Guide: Canada 2023. WWL National Guides identify national or regional leaders in a sector, industry… -
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Continues to Receive Top Tier Recognition from The Legal 500 Canada
We are pleased to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top tier recognition from The Legal 500 Canada in their 2024 Guide released today. Recognition from The Legal 500 is based on…