The Government of Canada has proposed legislation that will amend the Competition Act (the “Act”) to permit (i) far more private competition law litigation, and (ii) the awarding of significant new financial remedies for breaches of different provisions of the Act. These changes give plaintiffs new strategic options and litigation incentives, and create new strategic risks for defendants.
Here are four things to know about this new legislation and private competition law litigation in Canada:
New Financial Remedies and Incentives for Private Litigation (Including Class-Action Like Litigation)
At present, other than in criminal cases (like cartels), private plaintiffs cannot win any type of monetary award for proving the existence of or injury from anti-competitive conduct. Under the new legislation, the Competition Tribunal can order that a defendant “pay an amount, not exceeding the value of the benefit derived from the [anti-competitive conduct], to be distributed among the [plaintiff] and any other person affected by the conduct, in the manner that the Tribunal considers appropriate.”
- The opportunity for a plaintiff to be awarded a potentially significant amount of money from the defendant for its anti-competitive conduct creates strong incentives to launch private competition law litigation, and new risks for defendants.
- The ability to obtain a financial award that is to be distributed to third parties, including persons other than the plaintiff, may create incentives for the class-action plaintiff’s bar to attempt to launch non-cartel competition law litigation.
New Lowered Test for Leave
At present, and other than in criminal cases (like cartels), private parties can only litigate competition law claims with leave of the Tribunal. The test for leave is high and it effectively bars large and multi-product firms from launching private competition law litigation. Under the new legislation, a private party will still need to obtain leave of the Tribunal, but will be able to obtain such permission if it is “directly and substantially affected in the whole or part” of its business by the alleged anti-competitive conduct, or if the Tribunal “is satisfied that it is in the public interest” to grant leave.
- The test for leave has been lowered significantly, and a far greater number of plaintiffs (including large and multi-product firms) will be granted leave to launch non-cartel private competition law litigation. Public interest litigants may also gain the ability to bring proceedings.
Competition Law Expanded to a New Category of Conduct, and New Options and Flexibility for Plaintiffs in Litigation
The new legislation identifies a new category of conduct that contravenes the Act. Notably, a refusal to supply a person with a “means of diagnosis or repair” (including “diagnostic and repair information, technical updates, [or] diagnostic software or tools”) can be contrary to Canadian competition law and subject to challenge by the Commissioner of Competition or a private party. In addition, the new legislation permits private parties to commence competition law litigation alleging a civil conspiracy contrary to the Act (which was not previously permissible). Finally, the new legislation permits the Commissioner and private plaintiffs to allege that a defendant’s conduct breached multiple sections of the Act – e.g., that the conduct constitutes a civil conspiracy and an abuse of dominance.
- The “right to repair” is now a part of Canadian competition law.
- A private plaintiff or the Commissioner can allege that a defendant’s conduct breaches multiple provisions of the Canadian competition law in the same proceeding, which largely removes the risk of launching litigation under an incorrect section of the Act.
New Notification Requirement for Settling Private Competition Law Litigation
When private parties settle competition law litigation that has been brought before the Tribunal, the new legislation requires that they serve a copy of that settlement to the Commissioner. The new legislation creates a process for the Commissioner to challenge the settlement, and for the Tribunal to rescind or vary the settlement, if the settlement “has or is likely to have anti-competitive effects.” Failure to provide such notification can result in sanction, including an administrative monetary penalty of up to $10,000 per day.
- The new mandatory processes that apply to the settlement of private competition law litigation may make achieving acceptable terms of settlement more complex.
- This new notification requirement resembles the notification requirement that exists under United States law for settlements of Hatch-Waxman litigation, except this notification requirement does not apply to settlements of pharmaceutical patent litigation, but applies to all types of private competition law litigation under the Act (other than criminal cartel cases).
The proposed legislation is contained in the Government’s budget, and as such is expected to become law late this year or early next year. However, most of the changes described above are not expected to come into effect until one year after the legislation becomes law.
For further information concerning this draft legislation, please contact any member of our Competition and Foreign Investment Group.
Competition and Foreign Investment
Canada Expands Misleading Advertising Rules and Creates New Private Litigation for Misleading AdvertisingThe Government of Canada has proposed legislation to amend the Competition Act (the “Act”) to, among other things, (i) expand the scope of what constitutes misleading advertising, and (ii) permit…
Competition and Foreign InvestmentThe Government of Canada has proposed legislation that will amend the Competition Act (the “Act”) to permit (i) far more private competition law litigation, and (ii) the awarding of significant new…
Competition and Foreign InvestmentThe Government of Canada proposes a number of new amendments to the Competition Act (the “Act”) that will make it easier for the Competition Bureau to challenge mergers. This follows the Government’s…
Competition and Foreign Investment
Government of Canada Introduces Legislation to Amend the Competition Act, end the “Efficiencies Defence”Last week, the Government of Canada announced its intention to amend the Competition Act (the “Act”) in three ways. Yesterday, the government introduced Bill C-56, draft legislation that implements…
Competition and Foreign InvestmentThe Canadian government is enhancing its national security scrutiny of foreign investments, and pending changes to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) are likely to impact deal timing and risk allocation…
Competition and Foreign Investment
Government of Canada announces changes to the Competition Act: end of the “efficiencies defence”, return of compelled information production for market studiesOn September 14, 2023, the Government of Canada announced its “fighting for the middle class” legislative plan. As part of that plan, the government intends to make substantial changes to the…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans acted for Minute Media, a leading global technology and sports content company, in relation to its acquisition of STN Video, a North American industry leader in sports content distribution…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans acts for Tricon Residential Inc. in connection with its arrangement agreement with Blackstone, pursuant to which an affiliate of Blackstone, Inc. will acquire all outstanding common shares of…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP is acting for Cineplex Inc., a Canadian entertainment and media company, in connection with OpenGate Capital acquiring the amusement solutions business of Cineplex…
MiningGoodmans LLP acted for Hudbay Minerals Inc. in the closing of its previously announced court-approved plan of arrangement with Copper Mountain Mining Corporation, pursuant to which Hudbay has acquired…
Real EstateGoodmans represented H&R REIT in the sale to funds controlled by Oak Street Capital of 2 office properties (located in Calgary and Toronto, respectively) and 2 retail properties (located in…
Mergers and AcquisitionsGoodmans LLP acted for Rogers Communications Inc. in connection with the entering into of a purchase agreement for Quebecor Inc. (TSX:QBR.A) to acquire Freedom Mobile Inc. from Shaw Telecom G.P. for…
News & Events
Banking and Financial ServicesWe are pleased to share Goodmans lawyers have been recognized across Who's Who Legal's National Guide: Canada 2023. WWL National Guides identify national or regional leaders in a sector, industry…
Banking and Financial ServicesWe are pleased to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top tier recognition from The Legal 500 Canada in their 2024 Guide released today. Recognition from The Legal 500 is based on…
Banking and Financial ServicesWe’re pleased to announce Goodmans was once again named to The Globe and Mail’s Canada’s Best Law Firms list, recognizing us as one of the country’s best law firms for 2024.Goodmans was…