Adidas and Tommy Hilfiger Challenge Thom Browne’s Application for a Stripe Trademark
As reported by The Fashion Law, Adidas recently filed a notice of opposition with respect to a trademark application filed by American fashion designer Thom Browne in the United States. Adidas alleges that Thom Browne’s parallel stripes design is “confusingly similar” to its three-stripe mark “in appearance and overall commercial impression”.
Adidas first registered its three-stripe logo for use on cleats in 1949 and has enforced the intellectual property rights associated with the stripes ever since. Adidas’s confusion claim rests on the argument that the use of its mark on apparel has gained an established reputation and is sufficiently familiar to consumers.
In addition to the claim of potential confusion, Adidas also opposes the application on the ground that the proposed mark may dilute the distinctiveness of its brand and the exclusive association of the striped mark with Adidas.
Tommy Hilfiger has also opposed Thom Browne’s application, alleging, among other things, that the marks at issue are ineligible for trademark protection as they are not source-identifying devices, but rather are “design elements of goods”. In addition to opposing the use of the mark on Thom Browne’s apparel, Tommy Hilfiger has opposed its use in connection with a Thom Browne fragrance.
Author: Nargis Fazli
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@amarenselise
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…