Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by Samesurf Inc. (“Samesurf”). The successful defence came by way of a motion for summary judgment on the basis of non-infringement, thereby avoiding a full trial.
Samesurf’s patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,483,448, relates to a software feature that enables real-time, shareable web browsing data by transferring URLs and related information between users. In its claim, Samesurf alleged that a TurboTax feature allowing for synchronized internet browsing fell within the scope of the patent.
In finding that TurboTax did not infringe the patent, U.S District Judge Robert S. Huie held that TurboTax’s co-browsing functionality did not provide “substantially the same fully interactive browsing experience” as the patented technology. Further, the Court also noted that each platform had features the other did not, underscoring material differences between the two systems. Those distinctions were central to the court’s finding that Intuit’s software did not infringe Samesurf’s patent.
According to Bloomberg Law News, this motion resolved the last of a series of patent issues between Samesurf and Intuit.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Jonathan Toker, 2026 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jakubzerdzicki
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…