Adidas suffered a loss at the General Court of the European Union when it upheld a decision of the EU intellectual property authorities that limited the protection attributed to Adidas's three stripes trademark.
The Court determined that Adidas’s trademark does not protect the use of three parallel stripes in any direction. The Court stated that there was no “distinctive character” in such general branding, and it is an ordinary “figurative mark” which does not warrant trademark protection. The protection is thus limited to when the three stripes are slanted in a particular way, as is commonly seen on Adidas apparel.
The German sportswear giant was originally granted the more broad protection it desired in 2014. However, the trademark was challenged by a Belgium-based company, Shoe Branding Europe, and the trademark was subsequently annulled by the EU Intellectual Property Office. The recent upholding of the annulment may not put an end to the issue as the decision can still be appealed to the European Court of Justice.
A major issue identified by the Court was that Adidas had only provided evidence that the three stripes have acquired a “distinctive character” in five of the twenty-eight European Union member states.
Adidas released a statement regarding the ruling, saying it is disappointed with the result but that it is “limited to this particular execution of the three-stripe mark and does not impact on the broad scope of protection that Adidas has on its well-known three-stripe mark in various forms in Europe”.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Sasha Seeber
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@daryan
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…