
Alaska Airlines (“Alaska”) recently lost an appeal over a trademark licensing agreement at the Court of Appeal in London, in a decision favoring Virgin Group. Alaska was ordered to pay approximately $8 million per year until 2039 in royalties, even though Alaska no longer uses the Virgin brand.
The Trademark Licensing Agreement
The appeal gave rise to an issue of contractual interpretation of what was, at its core, a 2014 trademark licensing agreement (the “Agreement”).
The Agreement was between Virgin Group and Virgin America Inc., the latter of which merged with Alaska, which assumed all rights and obligations under the Agreement. Alaska thereby became party to the Agreement pursuant to which Virgin Group had granted Virgin America Inc. the use of certain Virgin names and trademarks in exchange for yearly royalty payments for 25 years.
Leading Up To The Appeal
By 2019, Alaska had ceased use of all Virgin names and trademarks, and stopped making royalty payments. Alaska was of the view that requiring it to pay millions of dollars per year for trademarks it was not using was commercially nonsensical.
Virgin Group successfully sued Alaska in London’s High Court. A judge ruled that the royalty was a flat fee payable for the right to use the Virgin brand, regardless of whether that right was exercised or not.
The Court of Appeal ultimately agreed with the High Court’s interpretation of the Agreement.
Authors: Kasia Donovan and Hannah Lee, 2024/2025 Articling Student-At-Law
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Changes to Trademark Proceedings Coming into Effect April 1, 2025
Amendments to the Trademarks Regulations will take effect on April 1, 2025. These changes are part of broader updates to the Trademarks Act, introduced through the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Heineken Battles Over "La Tropical" Branding
Heineken’s Lagunitas Brewery has reportedly advanced its trademark and copyright claims over its "La Tropical" beer in a legal battle involving Cuban-origin brands. As reported by Bloomberg, the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Super Loss for Marvel and DC? "Super Hero" Trademark Enters the Public Domain
Marvel and DC have reportedly lost their long-held trademarks for “Super Hero”. For decades, the two comic giants jointly owned the trademark, with DC using it for its DC Super Hero Cafe and… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Is Your Trademark at Risk? Understanding the TMOB’s New Pilot Project
In January 2025, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) is launching a pilot project in which the Registrar of Trademarks will issue 50–100 section 45 notices per month for randomly selected trademark… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rise of Trademark Phishing Scams
There has been a reported surge in trademark phishing scams. The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) issued a statement warning of an email phishing scam targeting members of the public by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
The Return of the Honda Element?
A few recent patent applications reveal that the Honda Element may be making its return to the automotive industry: The first patent application is a “camper for a vehicle”. The second…