Amazon’s intentions of using drones to deliver packages to customers have been widely known for years. Amazon announced in March of 2017 that it had completed its first delivery of a package by drone. Drone delivery has not yet come to fruition, but at the company’s recent “re:MARS” conference, Amazon stated that its drones will start delivering packages in the coming months.
As reported by Forbes, Amazon was recently awarded a patent that could give its delivery drones a second use: surveillance. The patent is titled “Image Creation Using Geo-fence Data” and enables a drone to monitor a consenting party’s property to gather data that can be analyzed to determine if the owner should be alerted to, for example, a door left open or a broken window. A key feature of the patent is that the surveillance function can be limited to only a consenting party’s property through geo-fencing and surrounding properties can be obscured. John Tagle, senior PR manager for Amazon said to CNET:
“Some reports have suggested that this technology would spy or gather data on homes without authorization – to be clear, that’s not what the patent says. The patent clearly states that it would be an opt-in service available to customers who authorize monitoring of their home.”
As with many patents awarded to large technology companies, it is unknown whether this functionality will ever be used by Amazon’s delivery drones.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Jay Piett, 2019 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@asoggetti
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…