Apple to close two Texas stores
Apple is set to close two retail stores, severing its business operations in eastern Texas. The closure is thought to be a strategic move to avoid the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas, which has become the venue of choice for patent assertion entities targeting technology companies.
In 2017, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a patent holder alleging infringement can only initiate lawsuits where the company is incorporated or where they have a “regular and established place of business”. By closing the two locations in Eastern Texas, Apple is seemingly hoping to fend off patent infringement suits brought under the jurisdiction of the Eastern District.
Earlier this year, following a jury trial in the Eastern District, Apple was ordered to pay $440 million in damages to a patent holder named VirnetX over infringements related to the FaceTime app. The VirnetX dispute was one of many which Apple has faced before the courts of the Eastern District in recent years.
Apple is planning to open a new store in the Northern suburbs of Dallas. Though the new store will be in close proximity to the two Apple stores set to close, the new store will fall within the jurisdiction of the Northern rather than the Eastern District.
Author: Ti-Anna Wang
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@glencarrie
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…