Bank of America (“BoA”) was recently granted a patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for an offline storage solution for private cryptographic keys. This patent adds to BoA’s growing portfolio of over 20 cryptocurrency-related patents, and over 50 patent applications.
This patent, titled “Systems and devices for hardened remote storage of private cryptography keys used for authentication”, provides for systems and devices that allow for tamper-responsive, remote storage of such keys. If physical or non-physical tampering takes place, a signal is sent that causes the deletion of the private cryptography keys from its memory. Essentially, the patent would be used to create a platform that is a bank for these private keys.
According to BoA, such private keys are typically connected to the public network’s local storage and are therefore susceptible to misappropriation. Even if it is noted that unauthorized access has occurred, there is no real time response. This technology is allegedly tamper-responsive in real time, resulting in the deletion of the keys from the memory of the storage device.
BoA is taking a proactive approach to this industry, even if its patents do not have immediate use. In June 2018, BoA’s chief operations and technology officer, Catherine Bessant, noted that: "We've got under 50 patents in the blockchain/distributed ledger space…While we've not found large-scale opportunities, we want to be ahead of it, we want to be prepared." This is a clear indication that large financial institutions are proactively seeking to protect their customers from malicious technological attacks in the pursuit of fostering a safe environment for the emerging cryptocurrency industry.
Authors: Abid Khalid and Jaclyn Tilak
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@chrisli
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…