Businesses Potentially Breaching Copyright Law by Streaming Personal Playlists
Businesses may be unknowingly breaching copyright law by streaming their personal music playlists to their workers and customers without a commercial licence.
In the largest global study of the background music business to date, Nielsen Music found that composers, artists, and musicians could be losing out on approximately $2.65 billion per year when their music is played in commercial locations without the appropriate licence. The study, commissioned by Soundtrack Your Brand (“Soundtrack”), looked at nearly 5000 small businesses in the U.K., U.S., Sweden, Spain, Italy, Germany and France and combined the findings with global small business data to reach its conclusions. Soundtrack is a Spotify-backed Business-to-Business (B2B) streaming company based in Stockholm. Soundtrack is the fastest growing music-streaming business in the world.
The study focused on small businesses, as larger companies tend to look at music as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility policy, and have strict requirements for the music supplier to provide fully licensed music.
Small businesses tend to have less awareness of copyright law and licensing requirements. According to the study, 60% of British small business owners thought they could legally use their own personal (B2C) music service to play background music. In the U.S., 71% of small business owners incorrectly believed they could use their personal B2C music in a store. Among small businesses with 10 or fewer employees, 83% are estimated to breach licensing regulations. Nielsen Music estimates that up to 21.3 million of 29.4 million commercial small businesses with physical premises are using personal services for background music, instead of a properly licensed B2B music service.
Soundtrack is working on various initiatives such as a new global licensing structure and rate cards for B2B music streaming to reduce the loss of revenue. The service provides ready-streamed Spotify playlists to businesses for a monthly subscription fee. The cost of this monthly fee is approximately $35, compared with approximately $10 per month for a consumer service.
Author: Abid Khalid
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@uneebo_office_design
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…