The England and Wales Court of Appeal recently rejected Cadbury’s attempt to broaden an existing trademark for the iconic shade of purple used widely on its confectionery (Case No: A3/2016/3082).
Cadbury registered a trademark for the Pantone 2685C shade of purple with the UK Intellectual Property Office in 1998. In 2014, the company attempted to alter the description of this trademark, arguing that it was in fact two distinct marks: one for when the colour applied to the whole surface of the packaging of confections, and one for when it was the predominant colour of the packaging. The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) rejected this interpretation as being too broad, as did the High Court.
At the Court of Appeal, both the UKIPO and Cadbury’s predominant rival, Nestlé, made submissions against Cadbury’s argument. In rejecting Cadbury’s appeal, the Court held that accepting Cadbury’s view would have far-reaching consequences. Taking particular issue with the second proposed interpretation, Lord Justice Floyd commented that the application of the trademark to products where Pantone 2685C was the predominant colour would be overreaching and would cover uses in “extravagantly different ways.”
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…