Calgary patents are on the rise, thanks to innovations in oil sands technology
With recent innovations in oil sands technology, the prospect of driving down costs (and emissions) to make the oil sands production process more efficient, sustainable, and economically viable is becoming an increasingly important objective.
Due in large part to a surge of patent filings in the oil sands sector, Calgary has now surpassed the likes of Ottawa and Waterloo in terms of the number of patents filed per capita.
Major energy and petroleum companies such as Suncor, Nexen, and Imperial Oil are developing (and seeking to patent) new ways of pulling oil from the oil sands using solvents such as pentane and butane. These solvents are used in place of water to produce more oil while at the same time reducing water use per barrel and curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
A number of enterprising startups are also patenting made-in-Canada solutions to the challenges of heavy oil extraction using solvent technology. Calgary cleantech startup NSolv, for example, has developed a solvent that can replace steam for in-situ oil sands operations, reducing water and energy usage and partially upgrading the recovered oil in the process. Compared to traditional steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), NSolv says its solvent technology will generate a higher return on investment thanks to lower capital and operating costs, while at the same time producing a "partially upgraded lighter oil” product.
With innovation comes challenge, and the key players in the oil and gas industry are not strangers to legal battles over intellectual property rights. In very recent years, a number of patent infringement actions have been commenced (and have proceeded through trial) in the Federal Court of Canada.
Author: Larissa Fulop
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@zburival
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…