Chinese IP court rules for Peppa Pig in landmark case
A specialized intellectual property court in the eastern city of Hangzhou has fined a Chinese company for copyright infringement after it produced toy kitchen sets bearing the image of Peppa Pig, a popular cartoon character.
The judge, Ye Shengnan, found that Shantou-based Jiale Toys Industrial had produced Peppa Pig products beyond the scope and after the expiry of the licence granted by British companies Entertainment One and Astley Baker Davis Limited, the co-owners of the copyright. The owners had registered Peppa Pig and three other characters from the franchise with China’s State Intellectual Property Office in 2014.
The case has been hailed as a landmark ruling in light of the perception that Chinese manufacturers have historically shown a disregard for intellectual property rights. Ye, the judge in the case, noted that the ruling is particularly significant because many previous copyright infringement matters in China have settled without producing precedent to guide courts in the future.
The court granted an injunction ordering Jiale to cease and desist production of the toys, and imposed fines both on Jiale and on another company which sold the products online through Alibaba Group’s Taobao marketplace.
The cartoon character is enormously popular in China, where consumers can purchase a variety of Peppa-themed products. A company plans to open a Peppa Pig amusement park later this year in Shanghai.
Following tensions with Western trading partners, China has taken steps to strengthen enforcement of intellectual property protections, including through the establishment of dedicated IP courts.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@rawpixel
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…