Drake’s trademark application for THC warning label rejected
Toronto-born rapper Drake, through his company Dream Crew, has sought trademark protection in the US for an image that appears to be similar to Health Canada’s cannabis warning symbol. The Health Canada symbol, a red octagon with an overlaid cannabis leaf and the letters “THC” (which stand for tetrahydrocannabinol), is found on all recreational cannabis products containing THC sold in Canada. Based on the American trademark filing, it appears as though Drake intended to use the image primarily on clothing, including t-shirts, hats, shorts, jackets, and sweatshirts, among others.
Unfortunately for Drake, his application has been rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on numerous grounds, one of which is that another company named Pineapple Express Inc. has already trademarked “THC.” The USPTO also cited Canada’s rights to the image as a reason for its denial of Drake’s application.
Via e-mail correspondence with MarketWatch, Health Canada’s Chief of Media Relations reportedly noted that “[t]he standardized cannabis symbol is protected by Crown copyright and intended to be used for public health and safety purposes only and not for private commercial means. It can be an infringement of Crown copyright to reproduce the symbol for commercial purposes without permission to do so from the copyright owner.”
The USPTO also highlighted the potential for confusion with other marks and the impossibility of using trademarks to sell goods that are not federally legal as reasons for its denial of Drake’s application. As Alison Masbury, an attorney at Harris Bricken reportedly stated, “If your intent is to sell products that violate the [Controlled Substances Act] you are not eligible for trademark protection. Their chances for overcoming that are very low.”
Drake’s dream isn’t dead yet. He and his team have six months to respond to the USPTO’s finding and address its concerns.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@rickproctor
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…