As previously reported, Levola, a Dutch company that produces “Heks’nkaas,” or “witches’ cheese,” has been in court battles since 2015 over copyright claims. Levola claimed that it held copyright for Heks’nkaas’ unique taste.
An opinion delivered by a Dutch lower court was ultimately appealed to the European Court of Justice to settle the question of whether taste can be considered copyrightable under European Copyright Law.
On November 13, 2018, the European Court of Justice delivered its ruling and decided against Levola. The European Court of Justice held that the taste of a food product is not eligible for copyright protection as it does not meet the requirements for being classified as a “work”. To be classified as a “work”, the product must:
- be an original intellectual creation; and
- include an “expression” that makes it “identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity.”
Levola’s Heks’nkaas did not meet those criteria. Cheese, like other food and drink products, is identified on the basis of taste sensations and experiences, which are subjective and variable depending on food preferences, age, and consumption contexts, inter alia. As a result, the cheese’s taste was not eligible for copyright protection under European Copyright Law.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Hassan Rasmi, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@lindsaymoe
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…