In Alfasigma S.P.A. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 561, the Federal Court (the “Court”) granted an application made by Alfasigma S.P.A. (“Alfasigma”) under section 52 of the Patent Act requesting that the Court add the name of Mr. Denis Severini to the list of inventors of Canadian Patent No. 2,538,546. Mr. Severini was part of the team of researchers who discovered the invention.
While section 52 does not provide any criteria for granting such an application, the Court held that the criteria found in subsection 31(4) of the Patent Act are relevant to consider.
Applying these principles, the Court was satisfied that the omission resulted from a mistake and that there was no improper purpose. In its reasoning, the Court also considered the lack of pending litigation surrounding the patent at issue and noted that a similar application made by Alfasigma for a corresponding American patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. For these reasons, the Court granted the application to add Mr. Severini as an inventor.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Eran Rubman, 2020 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@biancablah
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…