Gilead Challenges the U.S. Government Over Drug Patents
The battle between pharmaceutical giant, Gilead Sciences Inc. (“Gilead”), and the U.S. government continues after Gilead filed an action in the Court of Federal Claims (which hears claims for money damages by companies that contract with the government) against the U.S. government for breach of contract. The claims relate to Truvada, Gilead’s HIV preventative drug, and a newer version of the drug branded Descovy.
Gilead previously held contracts with the U.S. government called “material transfer agreements”, whereby Gilead agreed to provide the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) with drugs for research purposes. Pursuant to those material transfer agreements, the government had agreed to give "serious and reasonable consideration" to requests by Gilead for licenses to intellectual property stemming from the contracts and not to seek intellectual property protection for any inventions arising from the research.
Gilead alleges that the U.S. government subsequently applied for a patent using information from that research, and that it did not provide Gilead with the opportunity to obtain a license.
The U.S. government argued that the claim was barred by a six-year limitation period that began running in 2006, when the patent application was made. However, Senior Judge Charles Lettow recently ruled that Gilead’s injury occurred no earlier than 2015 – when the government’s patent was issued – and therefore Gilead’s claim was not barred by the statute of limitations.
Authors: Jay Piett, 2020/2021 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: Adam Nieścioruk on Unsplash
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…