Girl Scouts Sue Boy Scouts for Trademark Infringement
The Boy Scouts of America (“Boy Scouts”) reportedly plan to drop “boy” from their name and rebrand simply as “Scouts”, after announcing they will now accept girls into their programs. Boy Scouts recently launched a Scout In Me campaign to celebrate programs that will be inclusive of both girls and boys.
The change has apparently resulted in confusion among the public as to which programs are offered by Boy Scouts versus the Girl Scouts of the United States of America (“Girl Scouts”). As a result, Girl Scouts filed suit against Boy Scouts in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for trademark infringement. The dispute centers on the use of the word “scout” without a gender modifier.
The complaint states that, throughout history, both organizations have “coexisted” because the Boy Scouts “trademark is a symbol of youth development programs that…have been aimed at, led by and developed primarily for boys,” while the Girl Scouts' “brand identity” has been the “famous, registered Girl Scouts trademarks”. The suit alleges that confusion among names will “marginalize the Girl Scouts Movement by causing the public to believe that [the Girl Scouts’] extraordinarily successful services are not true or official ‘Scouting’ programs, but niche services with limited utility and appeal.”
Girl Scouts further argues that Boy Scouts does not have the right under federal or state law to use terms such as SCOUTS or SCOUTING by themselves in connection with services offered to girls, or to rebrand itself as “Scouts”. This, they claim, will falsely represent that Boy Scouts is now the organization exclusively associated with leadership services offered under that mark to girls.
Authors: Larissa Fulop and Pearl Lee, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@gpiron
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…