In-N-Out of Trouble: Beer Company Infringes on Trademarks of Famous Burger Chain
When it comes to cease and desist letters, they are often formal (at best) or hostile (at worst). However, In-N-Out Burger (“In-N-Out”), an American fast food chain, recently demonstrated that it is possible to lighten the tone, while still being effective.
As reported by techdirt, the west coast burger chain recently sent a cease and desist letter to Seven Stills Brewery & Distillery (“Seven Stills”) with regard to the logo on the company’s barrel aged neopolitan milkshake stout, which it called “In-N-Stout”. The beer can exhibited the In-N-Out trademarked palm trees, arrow and, obviously, a similar brand name.
The San Francisco based brewery even cheekily tagged In-N-Out in its Instagram post promoting the beer.
Even though the two companies are in different markets, the similar markings could potentially cause consumers to infer that the two brands are associated with one another. As such, In-N-Out decided to take a playful approach in its letter to Seven Stills by including several beer-related puns, such as:
- "Based on your use of our marks, we felt obligated to hop to action in order to prevent further issues from brewing"; and
- "We hope you appreciate, however, that we are attempting to clearly distill our rights by crafting an amicable approach with you, rather than barrel through this".
Seven Stills obliged In-N-Out’s request and has since changed the logo on the beer in question. In keeping with the good-spirited nature of this interaction, Seven Stills posted the letter to its Instagram page with the caption, “We count 9. Can you find them all?”, clearly applauding In-N-Out on its copious use of puns.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@dkingfoto
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…