Jerry Seinfeld Wins Copyright Suit over “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee”
A U.S. District Court has ruled that the copyright suit against Jerry Seinfeld, brought by his former colleague, was barred by the statute of limitations.
As reported by Variety, Christian Charles, a long-time collaborator of Jerry Seinfeld, alleged that he pitched the idea for the hit series “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee” to Seinfeld in 2002, only to have his idea rejected at the time. Years later in 2011, the two purportedly agreed to work together on the project. However, a dispute arose between Seinfeld and Charles over co-ownership rights and Charles left the show after receiving $107,734 from Seinfeld for his work on the pilot.
In February 2018, only a few months after the show had moved to Netflix, Charles filed a copyright infringement suit against Seinfeld, Netflix and Sony Pictures Television. Seinfeld claimed that the suit was time-barred by the three year limitation period. The Court agreed with Seinfeld, holding that “[b]cause Charles was on notice that his ownership claim had been repudiated since at least 2012, his infringement claim is time-barred.” The key issue for the court was not the nature or the extent of copyright infringement; rather, it was whether Charles's alleged contributions qualified him as the author of the show at issue.
After the ruling, Seinfeld's attorney commented that the lawsuit was “nothing but a money-grab seeking to capitalize on the success of the show.” Meanwhile, Charles's attorney stated that his client was “likely to appeal” the decision.
Author: Clara Ryu, 2019/2020 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@rodlong
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…