Chelmsford County Court has ruled that a claim for copyright infringement brought against Rod Stewart fails due to a lack of evidence. Julia McLellan brought the claim against "Sir Rod" after a photograph for which she purportedly owns the copyright was used in the video backdrop for his performance at BBC2’s Live in Hyde Park.
The photograph was taken by Sir Rod’s school friend, Christopher Southwood. Mrs. McLellan alleged she acquired the copyright to the photograph 15 years ago as part of a collection of photographs sold to her by Mr. Southwood in 2004.
Judge Simon Mitchell found that such a claim was “highly speculative”, as the claimant had not established that the photograph used in the show was in fact part of the collection for which she had acquired the copyright.
Mrs. McLellan believes her £9,999 claim was dismissed prematurely, claiming that sufficient evidence to establish her ownership of the copyright would have been easy to garnish had she known the issue would come into question: “We could have got a witness statement from Mr. Southwood confirming that he took the photograph if we had known beforehand that it was necessary, but this was the first time after several hearings this point had been raised”.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Sasha Seeber
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@fpvmat
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…