Michael Jordan Slam Dunk in Trademark Dispute
As reported by Variety, Michael Jordan has been awarded emotional damages in the latest of a series of trademark disputes with a Chinese sportswear company, Qiodan Sports Company.
Over the past twenty years, the sportswear company — whose name translates to “Jordan” — has registered approximately 200 trademarks related to the legendary basketball player. Among these trademarks is Qiodan’s logo, which features the silhouette of a basketball player closely resembling Jordan in the iconic Jumpman logo owned by Nike. In addition, the sportswear company previously trademarked the jersey number Jordan used throughout most of his career, 23.
In a recent decision, a Shanghai court found that Qiodan had made “a very obvious attempt to mislead” the public about its association with the basketball icon by using Jordan’s name in its trademarks without the NBA icon’s authorization. The court rejected the sportswear company’s argument that Jordan is a common surname that was not used in reference to the famed basketballer.
The court ordered Qiodan to issue a public declaration stating that it has no affiliation with Jordan himself and to take reasonable measures to clarify that its existing trademarks have no actual connection with the legendary athlete. In addition, the court ordered Qiodan to publicly apologize to Jordan for misappropriating his name and to pay the relatively modest sums of $46,000 for “emotional damages” and $7,600 for legal costs.
While the company can no longer use the Chinese characters in its corporate name (??), it can still use the phonetic English spelling of the Chinese translation (Qiaodan).
Authors: Meghan King and Rachel Oster, 2020/2021 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@patrickian4
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…