As reported by Forbes, four recently published US patent applications illustrate NIO’s aggressive plans to establish itself as a new player in the global Electric Vehicle (EV) market. NIO, a Shanghai-based company that publicly listed its shares on the New York Stock Exchange in September 2018, had previously announced that autonomous EVs would be available in the US in 2020, and appears to be taking steps to fulfill its commitment.
A majority of NIO’s newly published US patent applications relate to technological advancements in batteries. Two of the applications describe technology and processes for charging EVs at higher voltages, of up to 800V, to allow for faster charging. The third application relates to a “Real-Time Nonlinear Receding Horizon Control”, an algorithmic process used to improve battery life. The fourth application describes a “highly-integrated fail operational e-powertrain” for autonomous vehicles to meet the highest safety level, ASIL D.
It remains to be seen what the outcome of the NIO patents will be, but the announcement highlights the acceleration of competition and innovation within the EV space. With companies such as Porsche, Aston Martin, and Mercedes developing new technology to challenge the current leader, Tesla, properly securing intellectual property rights will continue to be a key factor in determining success.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Adam Voorberg, 2019 Summer Student-at-law\
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@thkelley
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…