Major League Baseball (“MLB”) owners approved the relocation of the Oakland Athletics to Las Vegas, marking the latest chapter for the nomadic franchise. Over the past century, the team called Philadelphia and Kansas City home before settling in Oakland, making Las Vegas the fourth city in the club’s history.
While the on-field move is progressing, the Athletics have encountered an unexpected off-field hurdle in the form of trademark protection. During their decades in Oakland, the franchise secured nearly twenty trademark registrations associated with its name and branding. However, the United States Patent and Trademark Office reportedly refused its applications to register “Las Vegas Athletics” and “Vegas Athletics.”
In this case, the proposed trademarks were found to be so broad that they could encompass any athletic organization in the Las Vegas area, not exclusively the MLB franchise. Although the refusal does not prevent the team from relocating, it does complicate merchandising, licensing and brand enforcement — for instance, by creating a greater risk of unofficial, or “counterfeit” merchandise offered by unaffiliated sellers.
Since the team has not yet begun playing in Las Vegas, it is currently unable to show that the proposed trademarks have acquired distinctiveness in the marketplace. That limitation, however, is temporary. The refusal could potentially be overcome once sufficient evidence of consumer recognition and association is established.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Hannah Lee, 2025/2026 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@ccadaptive
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…