Eliya Inc., a wholesale footwear company known for its BERNIE MEV shoes, and Skechers, an American lifestyle and footwear company, are involved in a legal battle over shoe design patents.
According to an article by JD Supra, Skechers sent a cease and desist letter to Eliya in which it accused Eliya of infringing two of its shoe design patents, specifically U.S. Patent Nos. D821,724 and D810,412. Eliya responded by filing a declaratory judgment action against Skechers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The shoes at issue have a similar shape and a distinctive bow situated on top of the shoe. While the shoes are not identical in appearance, identicality is not required for a finding of infringement of a design patent under U.S. law. A copy that is ‘substantially similar’ can suffice to infringe a design patent. Therefore, Eliya’s version of the shoe does not have to be exactly the same as Skechers’ version in order to infringe Skechers’ design patent.
Eliya is claiming Skechers’ design is not eligible for a design patent for two reasons:
- Eliya claims the bow design is functional if the bow serves to tighten or loosen the shoe, similar to the way shoelaces might; and
- Eliya claims the bow design is not novel – for example, PUMA had already been selling a shoe with a bow design in advance of Skechers filing its patent application.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Anna Condon, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jelizabm
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…