As recently reported by the Hollywood Reporter, Spotify has settled two large lawsuits in which the Swedish streaming behemoth was alleged to have committed “staggering” infringement of thousands of songs.
The lawsuits, originally filed by songwriter Bob Gaudio of the Four Seasons and publisher BlueWater Music Services, had become increasingly contentious over the last number of months, with Spotify CEO Daniel Ek even set to testify in the proceedings.
The settlements come at a time when Spotify is reportedly looking to focus on continuing to build its business. Just earlier this year, Spotify also settled a $1.6 billion dollar lawsuit over Tom Petty, Weezer and Neil Young songs. The settlement also comes after the passing of the US Music Modernization Act, which came into law in October 2018. The Music Modernization Act established a government database to manage the process and mechanics of securing musical licenses. One of Spotify’s biggest complaints about the previous process was the difficulty in identifying and locating the co-authors of the copyrighted musical works on its streaming platform.
While it appears that Spotify is now free from any major infringement lawsuits, it can be expected that, more generally, copyright issues related to the streaming of music are far from being definitively resolved. As the music industry continues to move away from the ownership model to a streaming model for consumers, artists will need to continue to fight to protect their intellectual property, and we can expect further legal developments as a result.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Adam Voorberg, 2019 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@onice
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…