“Texas Hammer” has second chance to nail referral center for trademark infringement
As recently reported, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a Texas lawyer’s trademark lawsuit against a personal injury referral centre over an alleged search-engine “bait-and-switch” scheme.
The plaintiff, personal injury lawyer Jim Adler, alleges that McNeil Consultants, doing business as the Accident Injury Legal Center, mislead consumers by purchasing Google keyword ads for his trademarks.
Adler’s marks include “Jim Adler,” “The Hammer,” “The Texas Hammer,” and “El Martillo Tejano”. In his pleading, Adler alleges that when users type Adler’s marks into Google, a “click-to-call” advertisement for McNeil’s services appears. If a user clicks on one of those ads while using a cellphone, it automatically launches a phone call to the personal injury centre.
Previously, the district court adopted the conclusion of a magistrate judge, who had found Adler’s allegations conclusory, and dismissed Adler’s suit for failure to state a claim. In reversing the district court, the 5th Circuit held that Adler’s allegations were sufficient. The 5th Circuit further observed that the case involves initial interest confusion, which has never been addressed in the context of search-engine advertising and which requires a fact-specific inquiry.
Author: Luke Devine, 2021/2022 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@polarmermaid
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…