The Commodores Win Trademark Dispute
A federal judge in Florida has ruled in favour of the holding company of the soul and R&B band The Commodores in a trademark infringement case against the band’s former lead guitarist.
Commodores Entertainment Corporation, or CEC, sued Thomas McClary in August 2014 alleging that McClary was infringing its trademarks by advertising his solo shows as “The Commodores Experience Featuring Thomas McClary” and “Commodores 2014”. McClary left the Commodores in 1984.
Judge Roy B. Dalton granted summary judgment to CEC on the infringement claim, deciding that McClary’s use of the word “Commodores” was likely to cause consumer confusion and was not fair use of the trademark. However, Judge Dalton declined to rule in CEC’s favour on its claim for compensation under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act on the grounds that the band had not substantiated its estimate of damages.
Earlier in the acrimonious four-year litigation, McClary had filed two dozen counterclaims against CEC and third parties and had sought to challenge the validity of CEC’s “Commodores” trademark. Judge Dalton ruled that CEC owned valid trademarks in a November 2016 decision subsequently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit.
The Commodores initially carried on business as a general partnership and incorporated CEC in 1978. The group, which previously counted Lionel Richie as a member, was signed to Motown Records and is known for songs including “Easy” and “Brick House.”
A trial to determine damages arising from the trademark infringement will follow Judge Dalton’s summary judgment decision on the infringement issue.
Under United States trademark law, individuals and corporations may file for intellectual property protection on phrases, names or marks associated with their business. Use of the trademarked material by others in a way likely to confuse or mislead the public may lead to a claim for infringement and monetary damages.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@diegocatto
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…