The Devil is in the Details: Nike and MSCHF settle trademark dispute over “Satan Shoes”
Nike and MSCHF have reportedly settled a trademark infringement dispute over modified Nike sneakers called “Satan Shoes”, sold by MSCHF in collaboration with rapper Lil Nas X. The Nike Air Max 97s featured a pentagram and included a drop of human blood in the soles. Retailing for $1,018, the shoes sold out quickly and caused quite a stir.
Nike, which was not affiliated with the shoe, made a federal filing against MSCHF, with a judge granting a temporary injunction to halt the fulfillment of orders. The settlement reached means MSCHF will issue a voluntary recall on the shoes and offer a buy-back program.
The release of the shoe coincided with the release of Lil Nas X’s latest single – “style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Montero (Call Me By Your Name)”, which debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart.
An attorney for MSCHF, David H. Bernstein, stated that they agreed to settle after realizing the release of the shoe had “already achieved its artistic purpose” and that the art will “continue to represent the ideals of equality and inclusion”. According to Bernstein, the shoes were meant as a “comment on the absurdity of the collaboration culture practiced by some brands, and about the perniciousness of intolerance.”
Author: Emma Baumann, 2020/2021 Articling Student-at-law
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…