USPTO cancels Sérélys Pharma's pollen patents
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has cancelled two of Sérélys Pharma’s patents relating to the therapeutic use of pollen extracts.
Sérélys specializes in therapies to treat hormonal and reproductive ailments. Until the successful challenge, the Monaco-based pharmaceutical company held patents on the application of certain water-soluble and fat-soluble pollen extracts from the Poaceae family of plants in treating pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS) and menopausal symptoms.
In making its decision to cancel the existing patents, the USPTO cited the lack of specificity in Sérélys’s patent filings and the failure of the company’s claimed uses to meet the requisite degree of inventiveness and novelty for continued patent protection.
Ohio-based Graminex, a producer of flower-pollen extract products, brought the re-examination request regarding Sérélys’s patents in October 2017.
The use of pollen-based products as a treatment for PMS-related and menopause-related symptoms has received increased attention following a 2002 study, which showed significant effectiveness in addressing symptoms.
Re-examination materials related to Sérélys Pharma’s former patents are publicly available on the USPTO’s Patent Application Information Retrieval system under the application numbers 90/014,026 and 90/014,027.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@fotojam
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its…