Verisign Files Patent Applications for Buying Future Rights to Domain Names
As reported by Domain Name Wire, Verisign recently filed two patent applications regarding securing future rights to domain names should they later become available. Verisign, according to its website, is a global leader in domain names and internet security. Verisign enables internet navigation for many of the world’s most recognized domain names and provides protection for websites and enterprises around the world.
The first application (US 2018/0302366) for “Domain Name Registration Reservation Through the Use of Encoding Domain Names” was filed on April 17, 2017 and published on October 18, 2018. This first application notes that a related application, “Domain Name Registration Reservation Through the Use of Encoding Domain Names for Pools” was filed concurrently. However, this second application does not appear to have been published.
The published application describes a process through which domain names may be backordered for when they become available in the future due to, for example, expiration of the domain on a certain date or when the current owner relinquishes the domain registration. Anyone wishing to secure a domain name for future use would register an “encoding domain”.
The application contains the following example:
For example, an encoding domain name that reserves a right to register example.com upon its deletion on Mar. 28, 2017 may be written as, for example, “dn–example-20170328.com”
The application indicates that rights could be to a specific domain name or a group of domain names and can be transferred to someone else. Additionally, rights could be ranked – essentially a line-up for the domain name.
The patents, if granted, may impact the domain name industry. It does not appear that corresponding Canadian patent applications have been filed.
Author: Alexandra Murray
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@nasa
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…