Charter Protection Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment Does Not Apply to Corporations
The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual treatment or punishment under s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not apply to corporations. It only applies to human beings. The corporate veil that separates a corporation from the human beings who manage and direct it, like its officers and directors, was a factor that weighed against s. 12 of the Charter applying to corporations.
Background
In 2016, 9147-0732 Québec inc. (the “Company”) was convicted under Quebec’s Building Act of carrying out construction work as a contractor without holding a current licence. The Court of Québec consequently imposed a fine of $30,843, which was the mandatory minimum penalty under the Building Act. The Company challenged the fine’s constitutionality on the basis that it violated the Company’s right to protection against cruel and unusual treatment or punishment under s. 12 of the Charter.
The Company’s arguments were initially unsuccessful, with two levels of court in Quebec holding that s. 12 is intended to only protect human dignity. A majority at the Québec Court of Appeal, however, found that s. 12’s association with the concept of human dignity did not prevent corporations from benefiting from protection under s. 12. A dissenting judge reasoned that s. 12 is concerned with human dignity and therefore corporations cannot be subject to cruel and unusual punishment.
Supreme Court Decision
The Attorney General of Quebec appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, which, in its decision in Quebec (Attorney General) v. 9147-0732 Québec inc., unanimously held that the s. 12 Charter protection does not extend to corporations. The words “cruel and unusual treatment or punishment” refer to human pain and suffering, both physical and mental, and is a protection only human beings enjoy.
Much of the discussion in the three separate opinions that make up the Supreme Court’s decision concerned a debate about the proper place in constitutional interpretation of foreign and international sources. But the decision also contains important insights into the constitutional protections afforded to corporations.
In the majority decision, Justices Brown and Rowe held that the concept of human dignity underlies the s. 12 protection against cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. They specifically stated that “the existence of human beings behind the corporate veil is insufficient to ground a s. 12 claim of right on behalf of a corporate entity, in light of the corporation’s separate legal personality.” So while a corporation’s officers and directors have a personal constitutional right to protection against cruel and unusual treatment, the corporate veil that separates those natural persons from the corporation itself prevents the corporation from benefiting from s. 12. As a result, excessive fines imposed on a corporation, without more, are not unconstitutional. This is in contrast to fines that are imposed upon individuals, which can be unconstitutional if they are “so excessive as to outrage standards of decency” and “abhorrent or intolerable” to society.
In a concurring decision, Justice Abella noted that of all the “Legal Rights” set out in ss. 7-14 of the Charter, only two have been held to apply to corporations: the s. 8 right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, and the s. 11(b) right to be tried in criminal and penal matters within a reasonable time. She noted that while “[c]orporations are, without question, entitled to robust legal protection, constitutional or otherwise”, it is widely acknowledged internationally that protections in human rights legislation against cruel and unusual treatment do not apply to corporations. As Justice Abella pithily noted, “there is a reason they are called human rights.”
Concluding Remarks
The Supreme Court’s judgment emphasizes that while there are significant benefits to the separate legal personality afforded to corporations, those benefits do not include many Charter rights that protect natural persons. If a corporation is facing excessive fines or penalties, it should consult its legal advisors about what other recourse may be available to it.
Authors
Insights
-
Energy
Supreme Court of Canada Interprets the Telecommunications Act
In Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the correct interpretation of the term “transmission line”, as used in sections 43 and… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
International Comparative Legal Guide - Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2025 10th Edition – Canada Chapter
Peter Kolla and Sarah Stothart co-authored the Canada Chapter of International Comparative Legal Guide - Enforcement of Foreign Judgements 2025 10th Edition. The Canada Chapter covers common… -
Crisis Management and Urgent Proceedings
Panoramic Next: Crisis Management 2025 - Canada Chapter
Mark Dunn and Sarah Stothart co-authored the Canada Chapter of Panoramic Next: Crisis Management 2025. Crisis Management explores the key factors that businesses… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Court Declines to Rule Out Duty of Care Owed by Social Media Platforms to School Boards
In Toronto District School Board v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al. (2025 ONSC 1499), Ontario Superior Court Justice Leiper dismissed a motion to strike a lawsuit commenced by the Toronto District School… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Changes to Trademark Proceedings Coming into Effect April 1, 2025
Amendments to the Trademarks Regulations will take effect on April 1, 2025. These changes are part of broader updates to the Trademarks Act, introduced through the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Is Your Trademark at Risk? Understanding the TMOB’s New Pilot Project
In January 2025, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) is launching a pilot project in which the Registrar of Trademarks will issue 50–100 section 45 notices per month for randomly selected trademark…
Featured Work
-
Restructuring
Sherritt International Corporation completes CBCA Notes Exchange Transaction and Subsequent Exchange Transaction
Goodmans LLP acted for Sherritt International Corporation in connection with its CBCA Transaction and Subsequent Exchange Transaction… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex to sell WestJet stakes to Delta and Korean Air
Goodmans LLP is advising WestJet Airlines Ltd. and its controlling shareholder, Onex Corporation, in connection with the sale of Onex’s minority stakes in WestJet to Delta Air Lines and Korean Air… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Andlauer Healthcare Group to be acquired by UPS
Goodmans LLP is acting for Andlauer Healthcare Group (“AHG”) in connection with a definitive arrangement agreement with affiliates of UPS under which UPS has agreed to acquire AHG via an all-cash… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires CanPrev
Goodmans LLP acted for Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of CanPrev, a leading Canadian provider of vitamins, supplements, and other natural health products… -
Restructuring
Tacora Resources Inc.’s CCAA restructuring
Goodmans LLP acted as counsel to Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd. (collectively “Cargill”), in connection with the restructuring proceedings of Tacora Resources Inc… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires Searchlight Pharma Inc.
Goodmans LLP advised Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of Searchlight Pharma Inc…
News & Events
-
- 02:00 PM Health and Pharmaceutical Litigation
Jenene Roberts at IPIC’s Annual Pharma and Life Sciences Update
Join Goodmans partner Jenene Roberts on May 22nd at 1:00 pm for the "Annual Pharma and Life Sciences Update" webinar with the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada (IPIC).This webinar will offer a… -
Arbitration - Domestic and International
Peter Ruby at the 18th Annual WCCAS Commercial Arbitration Conference 2025
Goodmans partner Peter Ruby will be speaking at the Western Canada Commercial Arbitration Society (WCCAS)'s session "Hot Topics II" at the 18th Annual WCCAS Commercial Arbitration Conference on… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Goodmans Once Again Recognized in the 2025 edition of Benchmark Litigation Canada
We are pleased to announce that Goodmans LLP is once again recognized as a Highly Recommended firm in the 2025 edition of Benchmark Litigation Canada.16 Goodmans partners have been recognized as being…