In January 2025, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) is launching a pilot project in which the Registrar of Trademarks will issue 50–100 section 45 notices per month for randomly selected trademark registrations.1 The pilot project aims to assess the number of registered trademarks no longer in use and ensure the Canadian Trademarks Register accurately reflects active trademarks. After gathering sufficient data, the TMOB will consult stakeholders for feedback.
Summary expungement proceedings, under section 45 of the Trademarks Act, are designed to ensure registered trademarks remain in active use. They allow the Registrar of Trademarks to request proof a trademark has been used in Canada in the last three years for the goods or services listed in its registration. If no valid proof is provided, the mark can be fully or partially expunged.
Trademarks at risk of cancellation include:
- Marks not in use: Marks for which owners cannot demonstrate genuine use during the specified period;
- Overly broad registrations: Marks registered for goods or services not currently offered; and
- Neglected registrations: Marks where owners fail to respond to a section 45 notice within the given timeframe.
Businesses or individuals with unused or dormant marks should regularly review and update their registrations to avoid vulnerabilities in such proceedings.
For assistance responding to a section 45 notice or strategizing on how best to protect your registrations, please contact any member of our Intellectual Property Group team, or visit the pilot project landing page for more details.
1 Section 45 of the Trademarks Act states:
Registrar may request evidence of use
45 (1) After three years beginning on the day on which a trademark is registered, unless the Registrar sees good reason to the contrary, the Registrar shall, at the written request of any person who pays the prescribed fee — or may, on his or her own initiative — give notice to the registered owner of the trademark requiring the registered owner to furnish within three months an affidavit or a statutory declaration showing, with respect to all the goods or services specified in the registration or to those that may be specified in the notice, whether the trademark was in use in Canada at any time during the three-year period immediately preceding the date of the notice and, if not, the date when it was last so in use and the reason for the absence of such use since that date.
Authors
Insights
-
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
International Law and Climate Change – Federal Court Decision in Lho'Imggin v. Canada
The Federal Court’s recent decision in Lho'Imggin v. Canada adds further guidance to existing case law regarding how governments in Canada may potentially face liability for climate change… -
Capital Markets
Successful Exercise of Dissent Rights Reaffirms Importance of Transaction Price
In a rare example of a successful exercise of statutory dissent rights, a group of shareholders dissenting from a court-approved merger recently obtained a fair value determination five times above… -
Energy
Supreme Court of Canada Interprets the Telecommunications Act
In Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the correct interpretation of the term “transmission line”, as used in sections 43 and… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
International Comparative Legal Guide - Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2025 10th Edition – Canada Chapter
Peter Kolla and Sarah Stothart co-authored the Canada Chapter of International Comparative Legal Guide - Enforcement of Foreign Judgements 2025 10th Edition. The Canada Chapter covers common… -
Crisis Management and Urgent Proceedings
Panoramic Next: Crisis Management 2025 - Canada Chapter
Mark Dunn and Sarah Stothart co-authored the Canada Chapter of Panoramic Next: Crisis Management 2025. Crisis Management explores the key factors that businesses… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Court Declines to Rule Out Duty of Care Owed by Social Media Platforms to School Boards
In Toronto District School Board v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al. (2025 ONSC 1499), Ontario Superior Court Justice Leiper dismissed a motion to strike a lawsuit commenced by the Toronto District School…
Featured Work
-
Shareholder Activism
Plantro Ltd. and Calian Group enter cooperation agreement
Goodmans LLP advised Plantro Ltd. in connection with entering a cooperation agreement with Calian Group Ltd. to accelerate its board renewal process and establish a temporary board committee to… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Andlauer Healthcare Group acquired by UPS
Goodmans LLP acted for Andlauer Healthcare Group (“AHG”) in connection with its acquisition by UPS via an all-cash transaction that values AHG at an equity value of approximately C$2.2 billion… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex sells WestJet stakes to Delta and Korean Air
Goodmans LLP advised WestJet Airlines Ltd. and its controlling shareholder, Onex Corporation, in connection with the sale of Onex’s minority stakes in WestJet to Delta Air Lines and Korean Air… -
Restructuring
Sherritt International Corporation completes CBCA Notes Exchange Transaction and Subsequent Exchange Transaction
Goodmans LLP acted for Sherritt International Corporation in connection with its CBCA Transaction and Subsequent Exchange Transaction… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires CanPrev
Goodmans LLP acted for Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of CanPrev, a leading Canadian provider of vitamins, supplements, and other natural health products… -
Restructuring
Tacora Resources Inc.’s CCAA restructuring
Goodmans LLP acted as counsel to Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd. (collectively “Cargill”), in connection with the restructuring proceedings of Tacora Resources Inc…
News & Events
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Goodmans Lawyers Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Litigation 2025
We are delighted to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Litigation 2025 continues to feature Goodmans lawyers among Canada's experts in litigation.Congratulations to our 13 featured lawyers:Andrew… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Goodmans Appears for Pharmascience Inc. in an Appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada
Goodmans appeared as counsel to Pharmascience Inc. in an appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada relating to the prohibition on the patentability of methods of medical treatment. The Goodmans… -
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Recognized in the Best Law Firms - Canada 2026
Goodmans is pleased to share we are once again featured in the Best Law Firms - Canada 2026, recognizing us as one of Canada’s most exceptional law firms across 42 industries and practices.We are also…