As part of an equity investment or financing transaction, investors often seek the right to appoint a board observer in addition to or in place of receiving an actual seat on a company’s board. These arrangements provide an investor with advance notice relating to the company and allow the investor a better opportunity to monitor the investment and keep up-to-date with matters affecting the company’s business.
A recent U.S. federal appellate court decision considering the potential liability of board observers under applicable U.S. securities legislation highlights some uncertainty south of the border regarding the potential liability for these observers. In Canada, similar uncertainty exists given the lack of consideration of the issue by Canadian courts. With that in mind, it is important that investors and their observer nominees understand the risks presented by this role, and take reasonable steps to protect against them.
Obasi Investment Ltd. v. Tibet Pharmaceuticals Inc.
In Obasi Investment Ltd. v. Tibet Pharmaceuticals Inc.,1 the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court”) concluded that board observers were not subject to liability under section 11 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 for misrepresentations concerning a company’s financial condition in its initial public offering registration statement (referred to as a prospectus in Canada). Section 11 imposes liability on those “named in [a] registration statement as being or about to become a director, [or] person performing similar functions.”
The central question in the case was whether the board observers possessed at least some of the core powers and responsibilities that define corporate directorship such that they performed functions similar to an actual director. On the facts of this particular case, the Court concluded that the two observers were not persons “performing similar functions” to directors, for three main reasons:
- The board observers did not have the right to vote for board action;
- They did not owe a duty of loyalty to the company; and
- Their tenures were set to end automatically on a specified date, so the shareholders would have no opportunity to vote them out.
While the decision in Tibet Pharmaceuticals provides an example of a court’s reasoning in determining whether board observers are subject to liability under the U.S. Securities Act, it does not provide a complete answer to questions concerning their legal status in the U.S. The answer to this problem in Canada is even less clear given the absence of meaningful judicial consideration.
The State of the Law in Canada
There is no statutory authority in Canada that addresses the liability of board observers and to date there is no reported case that considers the issue in any context. However, decisions from the Ontario Securities Commission and the Tax Court of Canada suggest that a person may be subject to the same liabilities as those of a properly elected director where the person performs functions similar to those of a director. While these cases did not involve board observers, their reasoning is nonetheless instructive when considering observer arrangements.
Directors and “De Facto” Directors
Section 1(1) of the Ontario Securities Act (“OSA”) defines “director” as “a director of a company or an individual performing a similar function or occupying a similar position for any person”. Similarly, section 2(1) of the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) defines “director” as “a person occupying the position of director by whatever named called”. Both of these definitions are expansive, and intended to catch all individuals who are acting as the “directing mind” of a company. These provisions aim to prevent persons who exercise the powers of a director from avoiding liability by arranging for others to be named under the formal position while maintaining effective control over the company’s affairs.2
In analyzing cases involving the application of these definitions, Canadian securities regulators and courts have developed the concept of de facto directors. A person is a de facto director if, under the particular circumstances, the person is an integral part of the mind and management of the company, taking into consideration the entirety of the alleged director’s involvement within the context of the business activities at issue.3 Where a person is found to be a de facto director, they could be subject to the same liabilities as an elected director.4
If a person takes part in some or all of the following activities, among other things, the person may be considered a de facto director (depending on all of the relevant circumstances):5
- Taking responsibility for the supervision, direction, control and operation of the company;
- Actively managing key aspects of the company’s business;
- Taking an active role in board meetings, including preparing agendas, moving motions, and providing direction to the board or management;
- Voting on or signing board resolutions;
- Instructing professional advisors (such as law firms, accounting firms or financial advisors) on the company’s behalf;
- Preparing and authorizing the content of corporate documents, including promotional materials such as brochures or press releases;
- Negotiating on the company’s behalf;
- Having financial and trading authorization over the company’s accounts; and
- Arranging a public offering.
If a board observer is found to be a de facto director, that observer may be subject to liability as a director, including under securities6 and tax legislation.7 Further, this reasoning could be extended to subject board observers to the fiduciary duty and duty of care owed under section 122 of the CBCA, as courts have emphasized that persons who exercise the powers of a director should not be allowed to avoid liability simply because they have not been formally elected as a director.8
Practical Steps for Board Observers
Given the uncertainty concerning the legal status of board observers, parties who intend to engage in observer arrangements should take steps to protect themselves from potential future liability.
To minimize risk, the observer agreement should expressly define the board observer’s role, function and tenure, and the observer should:
- Ensure that all actions, communications, corporate records (including board minutes) and filings reflect the person’s attendance and status as a board observer, and not as a director;
- Avoid chairing or directing the conduct of board meetings, or other actions that indicate “hands-on” management of the company;
- Not vote on motions or sign resolutions; and
- Not represent to others, through oral representations or by conduct, that he or she is a director.
Authors
Insights
-
REITS and Income Securities
The Legal Industry Reviews Edition 8 - REITs Chapter
Bill Gorman, Brenda Gosselin, and Stephen Pincus have co-authored The Canadian REIT Structure in the eighth edition of The Legal Industry Reviews Canada.To view the… -
Capital Markets
Canadian Securities Regulators Announce New Measures to Promote Competitiveness of Canada’s Capital Markets
In response to ongoing uncertainty in global capital markets, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently published three coordinated blanket orders (the “Blanket Orders”) intended to reduce… -
Capital Markets
Canada’s stock market is broken and we must fix it, The Globe and Mail
In an article published in the The Globe and Mail, co-authors Stephen Pincus and Brad Ross share their insights on revitalizing Canada’s capital markets.“The trade war with the U.S. has drawn… -
Banking and Financial Services
Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Temporary Exemptions For Derivatives Data Reporting Requirements
On February 20, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) introduced temporary exemptions from certain derivative data reporting requirements relating to unique product identifiers for… -
REITS and Income Securities
The Legal Industry Reviews Edition 7 - REITs Chapter
Stephen Pincus, Brenda Gosselin, and Bill Gorman have co-authored The Canadian REIT Structure in the seventh edition of The Legal Industry Reviews Canada.To view the… -
Capital Markets
Proxy Advisors Update Canadian Voting Guidelines for 2025
In late 2024, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, two leading North American proxy advisory firms, updated their benchmark proxy voting guidelines ahead of the 2025 proxy season…
Featured Work
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex to sell WestJet stakes to Delta and Korean Air
Goodmans LLP is advising WestJet Airlines Ltd. and its controlling shareholder, Onex Corporation, in the sale of Onex’s minority stakes in WestJet to Delta Air Lines and Korean Air… -
Capital Markets
Zodiac Gold closes non-brokered private placement
Goodmans LLP advised Zodiac Gold Inc. in connection with the closing of the second and final tranche of its non-brokered private placement… -
Capital Markets
Brookfield announces offering of First Mortgage Bonds for Bay Adelaide Centre East and West
Goodmans LLP advised CIBC Capital Markets, as Structuring Agent and Lead Left Joint Bookrunner, for Brookfield on its $433.2 million offering of First Mortgage Bonds for Bay Adelaide Centre East and… -
REITS and Income Securities
BSR REIT completes strategic asset sale with Avalon Bay Communities Inc.
Goodmans LLP advised BSR REIT in connection with the sale of an aggregate of nine properties, consisting of 2,701 apartment units, to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. for gross consideration valued at… -
Mining
Paulson and NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. to acquire Barrick Gold Corp.’s 50% stake in Donlin Gold LLC for US$1 billion
Goodmans LLP is advising Paulson & Co Inc. in connection with a backstop financing commitment entered into as part of its agreement to jointly acquire with NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. a 50% interest… -
REITS and Income Securities
NexPoint Hospitality Trust acquired by NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust
Goodmans LLP advised NexPoint Hospitality Trust in connection with its going private transaction with NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Lawyers Once Again Recognized in the Lexpert Special Editions: Finance 2025 and Mergers and Acquisitions 2025
We are proud to announce the Lexpert Special Editions: Finance 2025 and Mergers and Acquisitions 2025 once again feature Goodmans lawyers among Canada's experts.Congratulations to… -
Aging and Health Care
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2025 Once Again Recognizes Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP continues to be recognized in the 2025 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.Congratulations to the 96 Goodmans lawyers recognized as leaders across… -
Banking and Financial Services
Chambers and Partners Once Again Honours Goodmans with Global Recognition
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP continues to receive top-tier recognition from Chambers and Partners in the Chambers Global 2025 Guide released today.Recognition from Chambers and Partners is…