Deal Structure
Canadian M&A transaction structure largely depends on tax implications and bargaining power. Similar to many other jurisdictions, share sales generally benefit Canadian sellers since sale proceeds receive “capital gains” treatment. Only 50% of these amounts are taxable, and in some private transactions can be completely tax-free (up to a limit of just less than C$1 million per seller). Conversely, an asset sale is generally advantageous for buyers, providing a step-up in the tax cost of the acquired assets facilitating certain tax deductions for depreciation, among other potential non-tax benefits.
A non-Canadian buyer acquiring a Canadian business would typically do so through a newly-formed Canadian entity. On a share purchase, this newly formed entity would often amalgamate (the Canadian equivalent of a merger) with the Canadian target immediately post-closing. One of the primary purposes of this structure is to ensure the buyer has shares with paid-up capital for Canadian tax purposes. Paid-up capital is valuable because it can facilitate cross-border distributions without Canadian withholding tax, whereas dividends are subject to withholding tax. This structure also facilitates the deduction of interest on acquisition financing against the target business’s operating income. Canada does not have tax consolidation, so any acquisition financing would be borrowed by the new Canadian entity that amalgamates with the target to ensure interest is paid by the entity earning the business income. Debt financing arrangements can have other Canadian tax implications, including those related to transfer pricing, withholding tax, Canadian “thin capitalization” rules and potential limitations on aggregate interest and financing expense deductions, and should be socialized with tax advisors at the onset of any transaction.
Vendor Roll-Overs
Complexities arise when non-Canadian buyers use equity consideration when buying a business from Canadian sellers. The sale of shares of a Canadian company by a Canadian in exchange for equity of a non-Canadian buyer results in tax being payable on any gain inherent in the shares. In other words, a tax deferral (or “roll-over” treatment) is not available where the consideration consists of equity of a non-Canadian entity.
To address this issue and achieve tax deferral, non-Canadian buyers may consider an “exchangeable share” structure. An exchangeable share is a security of a Canadian corporation, usually established as a subsidiary of the non-Canadian buyer, designed to mirror the equity securities of the non-Canadian parent. This is achieved through a number of features, including the right to exchange the shares of the Canadian corporation for equity securities of the non-Canadian parent and the replication of all rights attaching to the equity of the non-Canadian parent (including dividends, liquidation entitlements, voting, etc.).
In Canada, the most commonly used post-closing purchase price adjustment mechanism continues to be the traditional working capital adjustment. However, in recent years the Canadian market has seen a marginal increase in the “locked-box” construct. Popular in Europe, a locked box mechanism provides for the equity price of a business to be calculated using a recent historical balance sheet. Once the “effective date” has been set and the locked box price calculated, there are no post-closing adjustments other than for defined “leakage”. Effectively, the locked-box construct passes economic risk of the business to the buyer at a point in time before closing.
Representation and Warranty Insurance / Indemnification
Canada continues to see an increased use of representation and warranty insurance (“RWI”) in private M&A transactions. Given the popularity of RWI, Canada also continues to experience an increase in “no liability” or “public-company style” sale constructs. Where RWI is not used or deal-specific risks are identified, escrows or holdbacks continue to be the primary risk mitigation tool used by buyers.
Interim Operating Covenants
Historically, the Canadian approach to negotiating interim operating covenants and related termination rights followed the U.S. practice. This may change following the recent decision of a Canadian Court in Cineplex v. Cineworld1, which offers an interesting contrast to a Delaware Court’s decision in AB Stable v. MAPS Hotel and Resorts.
Both cases involve a buyer claiming it was not required to close a transaction because Covid-related actions taken by the seller between signing and closing were breaches of the ordinary course covenant. But there the similarity ends. While the Court in AB Stable held that the seller breached the ordinary course covenant and the buyer did not have to close the transaction, the Court in Cineplex found the seller had not breached the ordinary course operating covenant, and was entitled to damages in excess of C$1.2 billion.
While the distinction could be explained on the facts, the Cineplex decision, currently under appeal, has brought renewed focus to these provisions in Canadian M&A agreements, and should be a key consideration for any non-Canadian buyer looking to acquire a Canadian business, which will have implications on transactions long after the Covid era is behind us.
Governing Law
In Canadian deals, the primary location of the seller’s business typically dictates the governing law of transaction documents. Non-Canadian buyers sometimes push for foreign governing law and/or jurisdiction for disputes, particularly where the buyer’s financing arrangements are governed by non-Canadian law. Canadian sellers generally resist this.
Acquisitions of (or investments in) Canadian businesses by non-Canadians are governed by the Investment Canada Act (the “ICA”). The ICA requires non-Canadian buyers to file a notice with the Canadian government, and provides the government with the ability to review transactions. Certain very large transactions are subject to suspensory reviews in which the investor must demonstrate that its acquisition is of “net benefit” to Canada. The Canadian government also has discretion to review transactions on national security grounds. National security reviews are typically based on considerations resulting from the identity of a foreign buyer or sensitivity of a Canadian asset or business. In transactions more likely to attract national security scrutiny – based on either the subject matter of the transaction or the identity of the purchaser – parties can eliminate the risk of a post-closing national security investigation by completing the ICA notification process before closing.
In addition, parties to a Canadian M&A transaction must notify the Canadian Competition Bureau of their planned transaction if two tests are met:
- Size of parties. The buyer, the seller and their affiliates have Canadian assets or revenue exceeding C$400 million.
- Size of transaction. The target has Canadian assets or revenue exceeding a prescribed amount, currently C$93 million.
Given the above, it is important for non-Canadian buyers to have a customized regulatory strategy. Buyers should complete an early assessment of regulatory risks, and devise appropriate ways of addressing these issues in advance to minimize post-closing risk, including potential divesture orders.
1Goodmans LLP is acting for Cineplex in the litigation, and also acted for Cineplex on the transaction.
Expertise
Authors

Insights
-
Mining
Ontario Proposes Limits on Critical Mineral and Essential Infrastructure Investments by Non-Canadians
In a political environment charged with concerns about foreign control over critical minerals and essential infrastructure, the Ontario government has introduced new legislation to safeguard those… -
Shareholder Activism
Navigating shareholder activism: The role of shareholder-called meetings, Lexpert
In a recent article for Lexpert.ca, authors Jonathan Feldman and Gurratan Gill discuss the legal framework governing shareholder-called meetings in Canada and highlights key considerations for both… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Canada's Updated Merger Control Laws-How the Changes Impact Strategies for Practitioners and Merging Companies, American Bar Association
David Rosner authored Canada's Updated Merger Control Laws-How the Changes Impact Strategies for Practitioners and Merging Companies in American Bar Association's Antitrust Source Magazine. This… -
Capital Markets
Canada Initiates Consultations and Proposes New Measures to Strengthen Anti-Modern Slavery Efforts
The Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the “Act”) came into force on January 1, 2024, implementing enhanced reporting requirements for certain entities to combat… -
Capital Markets
Canadian Securities Regulators Moving Forward With Access Model for Delivery of Continuous Disclosure Documents
On November 19, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) announced they are moving forward with the previously announced access model (the “Access Model”) for non-investment fund reporting… -
Capital Markets
Clarification on Rules Relating to the Removal of Directors by Shareholders
In OneMove Capital Corporation v. Dye & Durham Limited (“OneMove v. D&D”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) held that shareholders may not submit a proposal under section…
Featured Work
-
Technology
WonderFi Technologies Inc. to be acquired by Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Goodmans LLP is advising the Special Committee of independent directors of the board of directors of WonderFi Technologies Inc. in connection with its agreement to be acquired by a wholly owned… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex to sell WestJet stakes to Delta and Korean Air
Goodmans LLP is advising WestJet Airlines Ltd. and its controlling shareholder, Onex Corporation, in the sale of Onex’s minority stakes in WestJet to Delta Air Lines and Korean Air… -
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Apex Group Technologies Inc. to acquire a controlling stake in MapsPeople
Goodmans LLP is advising Apex Group Technologies Inc., a company backed by Round13 Capital, in connection with its agreement to acquire at least 51% and up to approximately 64% of the shares of… -
REITS and Income Securities
BSR REIT completes strategic asset sale with Avalon Bay Communities Inc.
Goodmans LLP advised BSR REIT in connection with the sale of an aggregate of nine properties, consisting of 2,701 apartment units, to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. for gross consideration valued at… -
Mining
Paulson and NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. to acquire Barrick Gold Corp.’s 50% stake in Donlin Gold LLC for US$1 billion
Goodmans LLP is advising Paulson & Co Inc. in connection with a backstop financing commitment entered into as part of its agreement to jointly acquire with NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. a 50% interest… -
Mining
Mandalay Resources Corporation and Alkane Resources announce merger
Goodmans LLP is advising Mandalay Resources Corporation in connection with its agreement to combine in a merger of equals transaction with Alkane Resources Ltd., pursuant to which Alkane will acquire…
News & Events
-
- 11:45 AM Shareholder Activism
Jon Feldman at IMN's Corporate Dealmakers Forum
Join Goodmans partner Jon Feldman at the IMN Corporate Dealmakers Forum for the session, “Deal-Focused Activism: What is Fueling Shareholder Activism Campaigns in 2025?” taking place on Wednesday… -
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Lawyers Once Again Recognized in the Lexpert Special Editions: Finance 2025 and Mergers and Acquisitions 2025
We are proud to announce the Lexpert Special Editions: Finance 2025 and Mergers and Acquisitions 2025 once again feature Goodmans lawyers among Canada's experts.Congratulations to… -
- Mergers and Acquisitions
Allan Goodman at the NACO Summit 2025
Join Allan Goodman at the NACO Summit 2025 on April 29-30th at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa where he will be moderating a panel entitled, “Mining M&A Roll-Ups: Lessons in Consolidation…