The subsidiary entity exposure conundrum, Canadian Lawyer

Neill May is a contributor to Canadian Lawyer magazine.  This article first appeared in the August, 2019 issue.

Excerpt from "The subsidiary entity exposure conundrum":

Faced with two alternative paths, Path A and Path B, you might be confused to find that Path A is wrong and that Path B is also wrong. If you think that both cannot be wrong, well then, you may be wrong. This is less a bastardization of Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof than a damned-if-you-do and damned-if-you-don’t moment. This conundrum is apparent in a recent decision about whether parent corporations might be legally responsible for the actions of their subsidiaries in remote jurisdictions.

Click here for more.