A Billion-Dollar Remix: U.S. Appeal Court Overturns $1 Billion Copyright Verdict
A U.S. appeal court reportedly found in favour of American telecommunications and internet service provider, Cox Communications (“Cox”), overturning a $1 billion jury verdict awarded to several record labels in a copyright infringement dispute.
The action commenced in 2018, when over 50 record labels, including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group, alleged Cox failed to restrict its users from downloading and distributing music without appropriate authorization. The labels specifically accused Cox of disregarding thousands of copyright infringement notices and failing to terminate subscribers alleged to have pirated music.
As a result, a Virginia jury found Cox liable for infringement of 10,017 songs owned by the various labels and awarded approximately $99,000 for each song, totaling $1 billion in damages. This is reportedly one of the largest damages awards granted in an intellectual property lawsuit.
On appeal, the Court held that the damages award was partially unjustified as “Cox did not directly profit from its subscribers’ infringement.” However, the internet provider remains on the hook for damages, as the Court affirmed its liability for contributory copyright infringement.
Accordingly, the case will reportedly be retried on the issue of damages.
Author: Ayesha Khanna
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@adkorte
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…