A Copyright Debate Over Tasty Cheese in Europe
Recently, Levola, a company that bought a recipe for “Heks’nkaas” or “witches’ cheese” initiated legal proceedings claiming that it held copyright for the cheese’s unique taste.
The Dutch lower courts delivered divided opinions regarding whether copyright could exist over taste.
- The District Court in the Hague found that Levola sufficiently substantiated its claim for copyright infringement and granted a request for the ex parte seizure of infringing goods (see: The Hague District Court, January 13, 2015 judgment (Levola v European Food Company)).
- In another proceeding, however, the same court dismissed Levola’s application because it did not demonstrate the requisite elements to succeed on a copyright claim (see: The Hague District Court, May 3, 2017 judgment [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:4384 (Levola v European Food Company)]).
- In a third proceeding, the Gelderland District Court denied Levola’s copyright claims on the merits (see: Gelderland District Court, June 10, 2015 judgment [ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2015:4674 (Levola v Smilde)]). This third proceeding led to an appeal to the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Appellate Court, which then referred the matter to the European Court of Justice (see: Arnhem-Leeuwarden Appellate Court, May 23, 2007 judgment (Levola v Smilde)).
The Advocate General of the European Court of Justice was of the view that original expressions must be sufficiently precise and objectively identifiable. His opinion to the Court stated that copyright typically only covers something that can be seen or heard. Taste, in contrast, cannot be perceived visually or audibly, and therefore cannot be considered a “work” under European Copyright Law.
Author: Hassan Rasmi, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@phototastyfood
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…