Bacardí Toasts to a Successful Appeal
There has been a new development in a long-standing trademark dispute between Bacardí and the Cuban government entity, Cubaexport, over the "Havana Club" name.
Bacardí won its appeal at the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The ruling permits Bacardí to challenge the US Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) decision, which allowed Cubaexport to renew its trademark, despite the statutory deadline having expired years earlier.
Bacardí and Havana Club both have roots in Cuba, but the rum industry was nationalized following Fidel Castro’s revolution in 1959. The founders of Havana Club lost its trademark, and the same trademark was subsequently filed for and obtained by the Cuban government.
Meanwhile, Bacardí was able to move production outside of Cuba and struck a deal with the founders of Havana Club to acquire the rights to the original recipe and trademark. Bacardí registered its Havana Club trademark in the US. The US recognized Bacardí’s claim to Havana Club under a statute aiming to protect Cuban companies that were nationalized post-revolution. Meanwhile, everywhere else in the world, the name belonged to the Cuban government.
The USPTO renewed Cubaexport’s US Havana Club trademark, despite it not having paid its renewal fee. This decision was the subject of a previous lawsuit, where Bacardí argued Cubaexport’s trademark should have expired in 2006. It was ultimately decided that Bacardí could only challenge the mark through trademark office procedures.
However, Bacardí’s recent successful appeal has revived this debate, allowing Bacardí’s court challenge to proceed.
Author: Hannah Lee, 2024 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@vinceveras
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…