Biker Gang Allowed to Keep Trademarked Logo
The Mongols Motorcycle Club, based primarily in southern California but boasting more than 1000 members worldwide, is a notorious biker gang known for its alleged criminal activities and also, apparently, for its trademarked logo.
The logo depicts a Mongolian man wearing sunglasses and riding a chopper-style motorcycle. For years, federal prosecutors in the U.S. have been trying to strip the Mongols of their logo, claiming it is worn as a badge of intimidation. As reported in The Star, prosecutors began their trademark quest a decade ago, following an infiltration by agents of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that ultimately led to 77 gang members being convicted of racketeering.
In late February, 2019, a California judge found in favour of the Mongols, holding that requiring the group to forfeit its logo would be unconstitutional. According to the National Post, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ruled that forfeiture of the Mongol trademark would violate First Amendment rights to freedom of association and Eighth Amendment protections against excessive penalties. Justice Carter noted that “though the symbol may at times function as a mouthpiece for unlawful or violent behaviour, this is not sufficient to strip speech of its First Amendment protection.”
Thom Mrozek, spokesperson for the U.S. attorney, has indicated prosecutors were disappointed with the ruling and may appeal.
Author: Anna Condon, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@arteum
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…