Bluewater Music Services Sues Spotify for Copyright Infringement
Bluewater Music Services (“Bluewater”) has filed a lawsuit against Spotify alleging willful infringement of more than 1,300 compositions. Each case of infringement could result in statutory damages of up to $150,000.
The issue stems from the fact that Spotify did not obtain mechanical licences for the compositions, which, until the Music Modernization Act (the “MMA”) came into effect, were required to reproduce and distribute music under the Copyright Act. The MMA alleviated this onerous process by establishing a mechanical licensing collective which was charged with maintaining a database of musical works and sound recordings. Bluewater filed this complaint before the MMA came into effect. We wrote previously about the MMA here. Spotify is also the subject of numerous other lawsuits in the same vein, and potentially faces billions of dollars in liability.
Spotify has moved for permission to file an interlocutory appeal (to take place before the trial, currently scheduled for April 2020) and seeks a declaration that Bluewater does not have standing to bring its lawsuit. Spotify argues that, because Bluewater requires consent to authorize mechanical reproductions at a rate below the statutory rate, Bluewater does not have the requisite exclusive rights to have standing to sue.
Author: Abid Khalid
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@andyadcon
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…