BMG Resolves Copyright Battle with Cox Communications
As reported by Digital Music News, the multinational music licensing body, BMG, has recently reached a settlement regarding its copyright infringement suit against Cox Communications (“Cox”), one of the largest internet service providers in the United States.
The dispute, which began in 2014, centered around Cox’s alleged failure to shut down the accounts of customers who were known to have pirated material. In response, Cox claimed the “safe harbour” defence under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which provides leniency for service providers where they are unaware that there is copyrighted material on their network. Alternatively, BMG alleged that Cox knew that customers were infringing BMG’s copyrights but still refused to terminate the customers’ accounts
BMG was initially awarded $25 million in damages at the conclusion of a December, 2015 trial. The decision was overturned due to faulty jury instructions. Prior to a retrial, BMG was given the green light by US District Court Judge Liam O’Grady to use words such as “stealing” or “theft” in their submissions. Shortly thereafter, BMG accepted a settlement from Cox.
Despite BMG’s reference to this exchange as a “landmark case”, no legal precedent was created since the dispute was settled out of court. As such, it will be interesting to see how a similar copyright infringement suit against Cox, brought by industry heavyweights Sony, Universal and Warner Bros, unfolds.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@othentikisra
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…