Burberry Sues Rapper “Burberry Jesus” for Trademark Infringement and Dilution
As reported by The Fashion Law, Burberry is suing Marvel Yarbrough, an American rapper known as "Burberry Jesus", for infringing and diluting its trademarked name and iconic tartan design.
In the Complaint, Burberry notes that the rapper’s social media is filled with images of him posing with Burberry-branded merchandise and his cars, which are wrapped in vinyl bearing Burberry’s copyrighted prints. Burberry characterizes Yarbrough’s actions as a “clear attempt to trade off of the fame and goodwill cultivated by Burberry”.
Although Burberry is best known for its clothing and accessories, it is also involved in the music industry. In 2010, the company established BURBERRY ACOUSTIC, a digital platform for emerging artists. Burberry selects artists that reflect the brand’s reputation and films performances that are featured on its website and YouTube channel. Burberry relies on its “passion” for the promotion of music to support its argument that the unauthorized use of its intellectual property misleads consumers to believe that there is an association between Burberry and Yarbrough. The company claims the perceived association has caused actual harm and is likely to continue to cause harm to Burberry by diluting and weakening the unique and distinctive significance and quality of the Burberry Trademarks.
Burberry began its efforts to prevent Yarbrough from infringing its intellectual property in December 2019. While the rapper initially informed Burberry that he would comply with its requests, Burberry later learned that Yarbrough applied to change his legal name to Burberry Jesus only ten days after the initial cease-and-desist letter was sent.
Illinois granted the name change based on an allegedly fraudulent application. As such, Burberry seeks a declaration that Yarbrough’s name change is invalid and requests permanent injunctive relief prohibiting the rapper from using Burberry’s intellectual property.
Author: Meghan King
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@claybanks
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…