A bill which would create a small claims court for US copyright claims is one step closer to becoming law.
The Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2019, or CASE Act, has passed the House of Representatives. The bill is meant to give independent creators an affordable and accessible way to defend their intellectual property, by capping penalties at $30,000. Any defendant in these cases would have sixty days to opt out of the small claims process, forcing the plaintiff to seek legal action in Federal Court.
While the CASE Act has earned support from the American Bar Association, it has also drawn sharp criticism from a variety of sources. In particular, the ACLU has expressed opposition to the CASE Act, stating that it does not do enough to safeguard due process and free speech. It has also drawn criticism for potentially exacerbating the problem of copyright trolls. While the CASE Act is not yet law, it only needs to pass the Senate to become law, indicating that there are limited opportunities to amend the CASE Act remaining.
Author: Mark Leonard
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@ianhutchinson92
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…