It was recently reported that Cloudflare, Inc. (“Cloudflare”), a website security firm, successfully defended a copyright infringement lawsuit filed against it by Mon Cheri Bridals (“Mon Cheri”) and Maggie Sottero Designs (“Maggie Sottero”), two U.S. wedding dress companies.
Mon Cheri and Maggie Sottero initiated the lawsuit against Cloudflare after discovering that several counterfeit websites, which employed Cloudflare, were using their copyrighted images to sell dresses. The plaintiffs argued that Cloudflare contributed to the copyright infringement because the company did not end the services for the websites that infringed upon the dressmakers’ copyrighted designs, despite stating in its terms and conditions that any violation of law justified the termination of its services.
Upon review, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria found that there was no indication that Cloudflare’s services were an essential step in the infringement process. Accordingly, the court concluded that Cloudflare did not materially contribute to the alleged infringement.
Cloudflare declined to comment on the results of the decision. However, in a blog post, the company noted that “While we cannot prevent online infringement, we’ve set up abuse processes to assist copyright holders to address the issue by connecting them with the hosting providers and website operators actually able to take such content off the Internet”.
Author: Mark Leonard
Photo Credit: Charisse Kenion on Unsplash
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…