As reported by Court House News, a Nevada coffee company has been ordered to pay Bob Marley’s family $2.46 million for trademark infringement.
On January 9, in an unsigned memorandum, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson’s holding that Jammin Java Corporation (“Jammin Java”) had breached its licensing agreement with Hope Road Merchandising LLC (“Hope Road”), the corporation formed by Marley’s children, which allowed Jammin Java to use the Marley Coffee trademarks.
The Ninth Circuit held that $2.46 million was a reasonable measure of Hope Road’s damages and that “willful trademark infringement is not necessary where a ‘plaintiff seeks the defendant’s profits as a measure of [its] own damages.’” The Ninth Circuit went on to affirm the lower court’s finding that Jammin Java’s use of the Marley Coffee trademarks precluded Hope Road’s use of the same marks during the infringing period.
Jammin Java also failed to submit evidence of costs or deductions associated with the Marley Coffee trademark, as it was required to do if it sought an offset against the amount of profits awarded.
Author: Jaclyn Tilak
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@nate_dumlao
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…