CRISPR Developers Make it Easier to License Gene-Editing Technology
Two major developers of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology plan to make it easier for researchers to license their intellectual property for use in commercial research and product development.
CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats. CRISPR-Cas9 is a system found in bacteria that helps with immune defence. Like a tiny pair of molecular scissors, the Cas9 component allows scientists to precisely cut away flawed parts of genes.
The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (“Broad”) and MilliporeSigma, the life-sciences tools division of German pharmaceutical giant Merck KGaA (“Merck”), have agreed to a framework through which they will grant researchers nonexclusive rights to patents held by both organizations with a single licence. Non-profit and academic institutions will be permitted to license the patents for free while others will have to pay a fee.
According to MilliporeSigma CEO Udit Batra, the Broad-Merck partnership aims to simplify the path to licensing CRISPR technology, which will “make it more widely available to the global research and discovery community” and “make it easier for … customers to be successful in their research that shortens drug development timelines for previously untreatable diseases.”
Author: Larissa Fulop
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@pawel_czerwinski
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…